System and Method For Aligning HVAC Consumption With Photovoltaic Production With The Aid Of A Digital computer

ABSTRACT

HVAC load can be shifted to change indoor temperature. A time series change in HVAC load data is used as input modified scenario values that represent an HVAC load shape. The HVAC load shape is selected to meet desired energy savings goals, such as reducing or flattening peak energy consumption load to reduce demand charges, moving HVAC consumption to take advantage of lower utility rates, or moving HVAC consumption to match PV production. Time series change in indoor temperature data can be calculated using only inputs of time series change in the time series HVAC load data combined with thermal mass, thermal conductivity, and HVAC efficiency. The approach is applicable for both winter and summer and can be applied when the building has an on-site PV system.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/151,410, filed May 10, 2016, pending, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent Ser. No. 14/664,742, filed Mar. 20, 2015, pending, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/631,798, filed Feb. 25, 2015, pending, the priority dates of which are claimed and the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference.

FIELD

This application relates in general to energy conservation and, in particular, to a system and method for aligning HVAC consumption with photovoltaic production with the aid of a digital computer.

BACKGROUND

The cost of energy has continued to steadily rise as power utilities try to cope with continually growing demands, increasing fuel prices, and stricter regulatory mandates. Utilities must also maintain existing power generation and distribution infrastructure, while simultaneously finding ways to add more capacity to meet future needs, both of which add to costs. Burgeoning energy consumption continues to impact the environment and deplete natural resources.

A major portion of rising energy costs is borne by consumers. Increasingly, utilities have begun to adopt complex rate structures that add time-of-use demand and energy charges onto base demand charges to help offset their own costs, such as the costs incurred when power must be purchased from outside energy producers when generation capacities become overtaxed. Consumers still lack the tools and wherewithal to identify the most cost effective ways to appreciably lower their own energy consumption. For instance, no-cost behavioral changes, such as manually changing thermostat settings and turning off unused appliances, and low-cost physical improvements, such as switching to energy-efficient light bulbs, may be insufficient to offset utility bill increases.

As space heating and air conditioning together consume the most energy in the average home, appreciable decreases in energy consumption can usually only be achieved by making costly upgrades to a building's heating and cooling envelope or “shell.” On the other hand, recent advances in thermostat technologies provide an alternative to shell upgrades by facilitating energy efficient use of heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. Existing programmable thermostats typically operate an HVAC system based on a schedule of fixed temperature settings. Newer “smart” thermostats, though, are able to factor in extrinsic considerations, such as ambient conditions and consumer use patterns, to adapt HVAC system operation to actual conditions and occupant comfort needs, which in turn helps lower overall energy consumption.

HVAC energy costs are driven by HVAC system use that, in turn, is directly tied to a building's total thermal conductivity UA^(Total). A poorly insulated home or a leaky building will require more HVAC usage to maintain a desired interior temperature than would a comparably-sized but well-insulated and sealed structure. Reducing HVAC energy costs, though, is not as simple as manually choosing a thermostat setting that causes an HVAC system to run for less time or less often. Rather, numerous factors, including thermal conductivity, HVAC system efficiency, heating or cooling season durations, and indoor and outdoor temperature differentials all weigh into energy consumption and need be taken into account when seeking an effective yet cost efficient HVAC energy solution.

Conventionally, an on-site energy audit is performed to determine a building's thermal conductivity UA^(Total). A typical energy audit involves measuring the dimensions of walls, windows, doors, and other physical characteristics; approximating R-values of insulation for thermal resistance; estimating infiltration using a blower door test; and detecting air leakage using a thermal camera, after which a numerical model is run to solve for thermal conductivity. The UA^(Total) result is combined with the duration of the heating or cooling season, as applicable, over the period of inquiry and adjusted for HVAC system efficiency, plus any solar (or other non-utility supplied) power savings fraction. The audit report is often presented in the form of a checklist of corrective measures that may be taken to improve the building's shell and HVAC system, and thereby lower overall energy consumption. Nevertheless, improving a building's shell requires time and money and may not always be practicable or cost effective, especially when low- or no-cost solutions have yet to be explored.

Therefore, a need remains for a practical model for determining actual and potential energy consumption for the heating and cooling of a building.

A further need remains for an approach to making improvements in HVAC system energy consumption through intelligent control over system use.

SUMMARY

Fuel consumption for building heating and cooling can be calculated through two practical approaches that characterize a building's thermal efficiency through empirically-measured values and readily-obtainable energy consumption data, such as available in utility bills, thereby avoiding intrusive and time-consuming analysis with specialized testing equipment. While the discussion is herein centered on building heating requirements, the same principles can be applied to an analysis of building cooling requirements. The first approach can be used to calculate annual or periodic fuel requirements. The approach requires evaluating typical monthly utility billing data and approximations of heating (or cooling) losses and gains.

The second approach can be used to calculate hourly (or interval) fuel requirements. The approach includes empirically deriving three building-specific parameters: thermal mass, thermal conductivity, and effective window area. HVAC system power rating and conversion and delivery efficiency are also parametrized. The parameters are estimated using short duration tests that last at most several days. The parameters and estimated HVAC system efficiency are used to simulate a time series of indoor building temperature. In addition, the second hourly (or interval) approach can be used to verify or explain the results from the first annual (or periodic) approach. For instance, time series results can be calculated using the second approach over the span of an entire year and compared to results determined through the first approach. Other uses of the two approaches and forms of comparison are possible.

In a further embodiment, HVAC load can be shifted to change indoor temperature. A time series change in HVAC load data is used as input modified scenario values that represent an HVAC load shape. The HVAC load shape is selected to meet desired energy savings goals, such as reducing or flattening peak energy consumption load to reduce demand charges, moving HVAC consumption to take advantage of lower utility rates, or moving HVAC consumption to match PV production. Time series change in indoor temperature data can be calculated using only inputs of time series change in the time series HVAC load data combined with thermal mass, thermal conductivity, and HVAC efficiency. The approach is applicable for both winter and summer and can be applied when the building has an on-site PV system.

One embodiment provides a system and method for aligning HVAC consumption with photovoltaic production with the aid of a digital computer. Time series net load for a time period during which HVAC load for a building will be shifted is obtained, an on-site PV system connected to the building, the time period including regular intervals. A time series total load is set to equal the time series net load plus time series PV production data. Time series non-HVAC load during the time period is estimated. Existing time series HVAC load is found by subtracting the time series non-HVAC load from the time series total load. An HVAC load shifting strategy is selected, including moving HVAC consumption to match the PV production, the HVAC shifting strategy subject to one or more conditions associated with an indoor temperature of the building. Modified time series net load is selected to match the selected HVAC load shifting strategy subject to operational constraints on the HVAC load remaining a positive value and exceeding the HVAC equipment rating. Modified time series HVAC load is found by subtracting the time series non-HVAC load from the modified time series net load and adding to a result of the subtraction the time series PV production data. Time series change in HVAC load is found by subtracting the modified time series HVAC load from the existing time series HVAC load. Time series change in indoor temperature for the time period is iteratively constructed as a function of the time series change in HVAC load and the thermal mass, thermal conductivity, and HVAC efficiency for the building. Whether the modified time series HVAC load meets the operational constraints and whether the conditions associated with the indoor temperature are satisfied is evaluated, wherein an HVAC system of the building is operated based on the HVAC load shifting strategy upon the evaluation the operational constraints and the conditions being met.

The foregoing approaches, annual (or periodic) and hourly (or interval) improve upon and compliment the standard energy audit-style methodology of estimating heating (and cooling) fuel consumption in several ways. First, per the first approach, the equation to calculate annual fuel consumption and its derivatives is simplified over the fully-parameterized form of the equation used in energy audit analysis, yet without loss of accuracy. Second, both approaches require parameters that can be obtained empirically, rather than from a detailed energy audit that requires specialized testing equipment and prescribed test conditions. Third, per the second approach, a time series of indoor temperature and fuel consumption data can be accurately generated. The resulting fuel consumption data can then be used by economic analysis tools using prices that are allowed to vary over time to quantify economic impact.

Moreover, the economic value of heating (and cooling) energy savings associated with any building shell improvement in any building has been shown to be independent of building type, age, occupancy, efficiency level, usage type, amount of internal electric gains, or amount solar gains, provided that fuel has been consumed at some point for auxiliary heating. The only information required to calculate savings includes the number of hours that define the winter season; average indoor temperature; average outdoor temperature; the building's HVAC system efficiency (or coefficient of performance for heat pump systems); the area of the existing portion of the building to be upgraded; the R-value of the new and existing materials; and the average price of energy, that is, heating fuel.

Still other embodiments will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, wherein are described embodiments by way of illustrating the best mode contemplated. As will be realized, other and different embodiments are possible and the embodiments' several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from their spirit and the scope. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram showing heating losses and gains relative to a structure.

FIG. 2 is a graph showing, by way of example, balance point thermal conductivity.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing a computer-implemented method for modeling periodic building heating energy consumption in accordance with one embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing a routine for determining heating gains for use in the method of FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing a routine for balancing energy for use in the method of FIG. 3.

FIG. 6 is a process flow diagram showing, by way of example, consumer heating energy consumption-related decision points.

FIG. 7 is a table showing, by way of example, data used to calculate thermal conductivity.

FIG. 8 is a table showing, by way of example, thermal conductivity results for each season using the data in the table of FIG. 7 as inputs into Equations (28) through (31).

FIG. 9 is a graph showing, by way of example, a plot of the thermal conductivity results in the table of FIG. 8.

FIG. 10 is a graph showing, by way of example, an auxiliary heating energy analysis and energy consumption investment options.

FIG. 11 is a functional block diagram showing heating losses and gains relative to a structure.

FIG. 12 is a flow diagram showing a computer-implemented method for modeling interval building heating energy consumption in accordance with a further embodiment.

FIG. 13 is a table showing the characteristics of empirical tests used to solve for the four unknown parameters in Equation (50).

FIG. 14 is a flow diagram showing a routine for empirically determining building- and equipment-specific parameters using short duration tests for use in the method of FIG. 12.

FIG. 15 is a flow diagram showing a method for providing constraint-based HVAC system optimization with the aid of a digital computer.

FIG. 16 is a table showing, by way of example, data and calculations used in the example house for the peak load day of Sep. 10, 2015.

FIG. 17 is a set of graphs showing, by way of example, existing and modified total loads, net loads, and indoor and outdoor temperatures with 0.0, 5.0, or 10.0 kW of PV production.

FIG. 18 is a set of graphs showing, by way of example, existing and modified loads, net loads, and indoor and outdoor temperatures with 10.0 kW of PV production.

FIG. 19 is a graph showing, by way of example, a comparison of auxiliary heating energy requirements determined by the hourly approach versus the annual approach.

FIG. 20 is a graph showing, by way of example, a comparison of auxiliary heating energy requirements with the allowable indoor temperature limited to 2° F. above desired temperature of 68° F.

FIG. 21 is a graph showing, by way of example, a comparison of auxiliary heating energy requirements with the size of effective window area tripled from 2.5 m² to 7.5 m².

FIG. 22 is a table showing, by way of example, test data.

FIG. 23 is a table showing, by way of example, the statistics performed on the data in the table of FIG. 22 required to calculate the three test parameters.

FIG. 24 is a graph showing, by way of example, hourly indoor (measured and simulated) and outdoor (measured) temperatures.

FIG. 25 is a graph showing, by way of example, simulated versus measured hourly temperature delta (indoor minus outdoor).

FIG. 26 is a block diagram showing a computer-implemented system for modeling building heating energy consumption in accordance with one embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION Conventional Energy Audit-Style Approach

Conventionally, estimating periodic HVAC energy consumption and therefore fuel costs includes analytically determining a building's thermal conductivity (UA^(Total)) based on results obtained through an on-site energy audit. For instance, J. Randolf and G. Masters, Energy for Sustainability: Technology, Planning, Policy, pp. 247, 248, 279 (2008), present a typical approach to modeling heating energy consumption for a building, as summarized therein by Equations 6.23, 6.27, and 7.5. The combination of these equations states that annual heating fuel consumption Q^(Fuel) equals the product of UA^(Total), 24 hours per day, and the number of heating degree days (HDD) associated with a particular balance point temperature T^(Balance Point), as adjusted for the solar savings fraction (SSF) (or non-utility supplied power savings fraction) divided by HVAC system efficiency (η^(HVAC)):

$\begin{matrix} {Q^{Fuel} = {\left( {UA}^{Total} \right)\mspace{11mu} \left( {24 \star {HDD}^{T^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}}}} \right)\mspace{11mu} \left( {1 - {SSF}} \right)\mspace{11mu} \left( \frac{1}{\eta^{HVAC}} \right)}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

such that:

$\begin{matrix} {T^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} = {T^{{Set}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} - \frac{{Internal}\mspace{14mu} {Gains}}{{UA}^{Total}}}} & (2) \end{matrix}$

and

η^(HVAC)=η^(Furnace)η^(Distribution)  (3)

where T^(Set Point) represents the temperature setting of the thermostat, Internal Gains represents the heating gains experienced within the building as a function of heat generated by internal sources and auxiliary heating, as further discussed infra, η^(Furnace) represents the efficiency of the furnace or heat source proper, and η^(Distribution) represents the efficiency of the duct work and heat distribution system. For clarity, HDD^(T) ^(Balance Point) will be abbreviated to HDD^(Balance Point Temp).

A cursory inspection of Equation (1) implies that annual fuel consumption is linearly related to a building's thermal conductivity. This implication further suggests that calculating fuel savings associated with building envelope or shell improvements is straightforward. In practice, however, such calculations are not straightforward because Equation (1) was formulated with the goal of determining the fuel required to satisfy heating energy needs. As such, there are several additional factors that the equation must take into consideration.

First, Equation (1) needs to reflect the fuel that is required only when indoor temperature exceeds outdoor temperature. This need led to the heating degree day (HDD) approach (or could be applied on a shorter time interval basis of less than one day) of calculating the difference between the average daily (or hourly) indoor and outdoor temperatures and retaining only the positive values. This approach complicates Equation (1) because the results of a non-linear term must be summed, that is, the maximum of the difference between average indoor and outdoor temperatures and zero. Non-linear equations complicate integration, that is, the continuous version of summation.

Second, Equation (1) includes the term Balance Point temperature (T^(Balance Point)). The goal of including the term T^(Balance Point) was to recognize that the internal heating gains of the building effectively lowered the number of degrees of temperature that auxiliary heating needed to supply relative to the temperature setting of the thermostat T^(Set Point). A balance point temperature T^(Balance Point) of 65° F. was initially selected under the assumption that 65° F. approximately accounted for the internal gains. As buildings became more efficient, however, an adjustment to the balance point temperature T^(Balance Point) was needed based on the building's thermal conductivity (UA^(Total)) and internal gains. This assumption further complicated Equation (1) because the equation became indirectly dependent on (and inversely related to) UA^(Total) through T^(Balance Point).

Third, Equation (1) addresses fuel consumption by auxiliary heating sources. As a result, Equation (1) must be adjusted to account for solar gains. This adjustment was accomplished using the Solar Savings Fraction (SSF). The SSF is based on the Load Collector Ratio (see Eq. 7.4 in Randolf and Masters, p. 278, cited supra, for information about the LCR). The LCR, however, is also a function of UA^(Total) As a result, the SSF is a function of UA^(Total) in a complicated, non-closed form solution manner. Thus, the SSF further complicates calculating the fuel savings associated with building shell improvements because the SSF is indirectly dependent on UA^(Total).

As a result, these direct and indirect dependencies in Equation (1) significantly complicate calculating a change in annual fuel consumption based on a change in thermal conductivity. The difficulty is made evident by taking the derivative of Equation (1) with respect to a change in thermal conductivity. The chain and product rules from calculus need to be employed since HDD^(Balance Point Temp) and SSF are indirectly dependent on UA^(Total):

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{{dQ}^{Fuel}}{{dUA}^{Total}} = {\left\{ {{\left( {UA}^{Total} \right)\;\left\lbrack {{\left( {HDD}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}\mspace{14mu} {Temp}} \right)\mspace{11mu} \left( {{- \frac{dSSF}{dLCR}}\frac{dLCR}{{dUA}^{Total}}} \right)} + {\left( {\frac{{dHDD}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}\mspace{14mu} {Temp}}}{{dT}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}}}\frac{{dT}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}}}{{dUA}^{Total}}} \right)\mspace{11mu} \left( {1 - {SSF}} \right)}} \right\rbrack} + {\left( {HDD}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}\mspace{14mu} {Temp}} \right)\mspace{11mu} \left( {1 - {SSF}} \right)}} \right\} \mspace{11mu} \left( \frac{24}{\eta^{HVAC}} \right)}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

The result is Equation (4), which is an equation that is difficult to solve due to the number and variety of unknown inputs that are required.

To add even further complexity to the problem of solving Equation (4), conventionally, UA^(Total) is determined analytically by performing a detailed energy audit of a building. An energy audit involves measuring physical dimensions of walls, windows, doors, and other building parts; approximating R-values for thermal resistance; estimating infiltration using a blower door test; and detecting air leakage. A numerical model is then run to perform the calculations necessary to estimate thermal conductivity. Such an energy audit can be costly, time consuming, and invasive for building owners and occupants. Moreover, as a calculated result, the value estimated for UA^(Total) carries the potential for inaccuracies, as the model is strongly influenced by physical mismeasurements or omissions, data assumptions, and so forth.

Empirically-Based Approaches to Modeling Heating Fuel Consumption

Building heating (and cooling) fuel consumption can be calculated through two approaches, annual (or periodic) and hourly (or interval), to thermally characterize a building without intrusive and time-consuming tests. The first approach, as further described infra beginning with reference to BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1, requires typical monthly utility billing data and approximations of heating (or cooling) losses and gains. The second approach, as further described infra beginning with reference to FIG. 11, involves empirically deriving three building-specific parameters, thermal mass, thermal conductivity, and effective window area, plus HVAC system efficiency using short duration tests that last at most several days. The parameters are then used to simulate a time series of indoor building temperature and of fuel consumption.

While the discussion herein is centered on building heating requirements, the same principles can be applied to an analysis of building cooling requirements. In addition, conversion factors for occupant heating gains (250 Btu of heat per person per hour), heating gains from internal electricity consumption (3,412 Btu per kWh), solar resource heating gains (3,412 Btu per kWh), and fuel pricing(

$\frac{{Price}^{NG}}{10^{5}}$

if in units of $ per therm and

$\frac{{Price}^{Electrity}}{3,412}$

if in units of $ per kWh) are used by way of example; other conversion factors or expressions are possible.

First Approach: Annual (or Periodic) Fuel Consumption

Fundamentally, thermal conductivity is the property of a material, here, a structure, to conduct heat. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram 10 showing heating losses and gains relative to a structure 11. Inefficiencies in the shell 12 (or envelope) of a structure 11 can result in losses in interior heating 14, whereas gains 13 in heating generally originate either from sources within (or internal to) the structure 11, including heating gains from occupants 15, gains from operation of electric devices 16, and solar gains 17, or from auxiliary heating sources 18 that are specifically intended to provide heat to the structure's interior.

In this first approach, the concepts of balance point temperatures and solar savings fractions, per Equation (1), are eliminated. Instead, balance point temperatures and solar savings fractions are replaced with the single concept of balance point thermal conductivity. This substitution is made by separately allocating the total thermal conductivity of a building (UA^(Total)) to thermal conductivity for internal heating gains (UA^(Balance Point)), including occupancy, heat produced by operation of certain electric devices, and solar gains, and thermal conductivity for auxiliary heating (UA^(Auxiliary Heating)). The end result is Equation (34), further discussed in detail infra, which eliminates the indirect and non-linear parameter relationships in Equation (1) to UA^(Total).

The conceptual relationships embodied in Equation (34) can be described with the assistance of a diagram. FIG. 2 is a graph 20 showing, by way of example, balance point thermal conductivity UA^(Balance Point), that is, the thermal conductivity for internal heating gains. The x-axis 21 represents total thermal conductivity, UA^(Total), of a building (in units of Btu/hr-° F.). The y-axis 22 represents total heating energy consumed to heat the building. Total thermal conductivity 21 (along the x-axis) is divided into “balance point” thermal conductivity (UA^(Balance Point)) 23 and “heating system” (or auxiliary heating) thermal conductivity (UA^(Auxiliary Heating)) 24. “Balance point” thermal conductivity 23 characterizes heating losses, which can occur, for example, due to the escape of heat through the building envelope to the outside and by the infiltration of cold air through the building envelope into the building's interior that are compensated for by internal gains. “Heating system” thermal conductivity 24 characterizes heating gains, which reflects the heating delivered to the building's interior above the balance point temperature T^(Balance Point), generally as determined by the setting of the auxiliary heating source's thermostat or other control point.

In this approach, total heating energy 22 (along the y-axis) is divided into gains from internal heating 25 and gains from auxiliary heating energy 25. Internal heating gains are broken down into heating gains from occupants 27, gains from operation of electric devices 28 in the building, and solar gains 29. Sources of auxiliary heating energy include, for instance, natural gas furnace 30 (here, with a 56% efficiency), electric resistance heating 31 (here, with a 100% efficiency), and electric heat pump 32 (here, with a 250% efficiency). Other sources of heating losses and gains are possible.

The first approach provides an estimate of fuel consumption over a year or other period of inquiry based on the separation of thermal conductivity into internal heating gains and auxiliary heating. FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing a computer-implemented method 40 for modeling periodic building heating energy consumption in accordance with one embodiment. Execution of the software can be performed with the assistance of a computer system, such as further described infra with reference to FIG. 26, as a series of process or method modules or steps.

In the first part of the approach (steps 41-43), heating losses and heating gains are separately analyzed. In the second part of the approach (steps 44-46), the portion of the heating gains that need to be provided by fuel, that is, through the consumption of energy for generating heating using auxiliary heating 18 (shown in BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1), is determined to yield a value for annual (or periodic) fuel consumption. Each of the steps will now be described in detail.

Specify Time Period

Heating requirements are concentrated during the winter months, so as an initial step, the time period of inquiry is specified (step 41). The heating degree day approach (HDD) in Equation (1) requires examining all of the days of the year and including only those days where outdoor temperatures are less than a certain balance point temperature. However, this approach specifies the time period of inquiry as the winter season and considers all of the days (or all of the hours, or other time units) during the winter season. Other periods of inquiry are also possible, such as a five- or ten-year time frame, as well as shorter time periods, such as one- or two-month intervals.

Separate Heating Losses from Heating Gains

Heating losses are considered separately from heating gains (step 42). The rationale for drawing this distinction will now be discussed.

Heating Losses

For the sake of discussion herein, those regions located mainly in the lower latitudes, where outdoor temperatures remain fairly moderate year round, will be ignored and focus placed instead on those regions that experience seasonal shifts of weather and climate. Under this assumption, a heating degree day (HDD) approach specifies that outdoor temperature must be less than indoor temperature. No such limitation is applied in this present approach. Heating losses are negative if outdoor temperature exceeds indoor temperature, which indicates that the building will gain heat during these times. Since the time period has been limited to only the winter season, there will likely to be a limited number of days when that situation could occur and, in those limited times, the building will benefit by positive heating gain. (Note that an adjustment would be required if the building took advantage of the benefit of higher outdoor temperatures by circulating outdoor air inside when this condition occurs. This adjustment could be made by treating the condition as an additional source of heating gain.)

As a result, fuel consumption for heating losses Q^(Losses) over the winter season equals the product of the building's total thermal conductivity UA^(Total) and the difference between the indoor T^(Indoor) and outdoor temperature T^(Outdoor), summed over all of the hours of the winter season:

$\begin{matrix} {Q^{Losses} = {\sum\limits_{t^{Start}}^{t^{End}}{\left( {UA}^{Total} \right)\left( {T_{t}^{Indoor} - T_{t}^{Outdoor}} \right)}}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

where Start and End respectively represent the first and last hours of the winter (heating) season.

Equation (5) can be simplified by solving the summation. Thus, total heating losses Q^(Losses) equal the product of thermal conductivity UA^(Total) and the difference between average indoor temperature T ^(Indoor) and average outdoor temperature T ^(Outdoor) over the winter season and the number of hours H in the season over which the average is calculated:

Q ^(Losses)=(UA ^(Total))( T ^(Indoor) −T ^(Outdoor))(H)  (6)

Heating Gains

Heating gains are calculated for two broad categories (step 43) based on the source of heating, internal heating gains Q^(Gains-Internal) and auxiliary heating gains Q^(Gains-Auxiliary Heating), as further described infra with reference to FIG. 4. Internal heating gains can be subdivided into heating gained from occupants Q^(Gains-Occupants), heating gained from the operation of electric devices Q^(Gains-Electric), and heating gained from solar heating Q^(Gains-Solar). Other sources of internal heating gains are possible. The total amount of heating gained Q^(Gains) from these two categories of heating sources equals:

Q ^(Gains) =Q ^(Gains-Internal) +Q ^(Gains-Auxiliary Heating)  (7)

where

Q ^(Gains-Internal) =Q ^(Gains-Occupants) +Q ^(Gains-Electric) +Q ^(Gains-Solar)  (8)

Calculate Heating Gains

Equation (8) states that internal heating gains Q^(Gains-Internal) include heating gains from Occupant, Electric, and Solar heating sources. FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing a routine 50 for determining heating gains for use in the method 40 of FIG. 3 Each of these heating gain sources will now be discussed.

Occupant Heating Gains

People occupying a building generate heat. Occupant heating gains Q^(Gains-Occupants) (step 51) equal the product of the heat produced per person, the average number of people in a building over the time period, and the number of hours (H) (or other time units) in that time period. Let P represent the average number of people. For instance, using a conversion factor of 250 Btu of heat per person per hour, heating gains from the occupants Q^(Gains-Occupants) equal:

Q ^(Gains-Occupants)=250( P )(H)  (9)

Other conversion factors or expressions are possible.

Electric Heating Gains

The operation of electric devices that deliver all heat that is generated into the interior of the building, for instance, lights, refrigerators, and the like, contribute to internal heating gain. Electric heating gains Q^(Gams-Electric) (step 52) equal the amount of electricity used in the building that is converted to heat over the time period.

Care needs to be taken to ensure that the measured electricity consumption corresponds to the indoor usage. Two adjustments may be required. First, many electric utilities measure net electricity consumption. The energy produced by any photovoltaic (PV) system needs to be added back to net energy consumption (Net) to result in gross consumption if the building has a net-metered PV system. This amount can be estimated using time- and location-correlated solar resource data, as well as specific information about the orientation and other characteristics of the photovoltaic system, such as can be provided by the Solar Anywhere SystemCheck service (http://www.SolarAnywhere.com), a Web-based service operated by Clean Power Research, L.L.C., Napa, Calif., with the approach described, for instance, in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application, entitled “Computer-Implemented System and Method for Estimating Gross Energy Load of a Building,” Ser. No. 14/531,940, filed Nov. 3, 2014, pending, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, or measured directly.

Second, some uses of electricity may not contribute heat to the interior of the building and need be factored out as external electric heating gains (External). These uses include electricity used for electric vehicle charging, electric dryers (assuming that most of the hot exhaust air is vented outside of the building, as typically required by building code), outdoor pool pumps, and electric water heating using either direct heating or heat pump technologies (assuming that most of the hot water goes down the drain and outside the building—a large body of standing hot water, such as a bathtub filled with hot water, can be considered transient and not likely to appreciably increase the temperature indoors over the long run).

For instance, using a conversion factor from kWh to Btu of 3,412 Btu per kWh (since Q^(Gains-Electric) is in units of Btu), internal electric gains Q^(Gains-Electric) equal:

$\begin{matrix} {Q^{{Gains} - {Electric}} = {\left( \overset{\_}{{Net} + {PV} - {External}} \right)\mspace{11mu} (H)\mspace{11mu} \left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{kWh} \right)}} & (10) \end{matrix}$

where Net represents net energy consumption, PV represents any energy produced by a PV system, External represents heating gains attributable to electric sources that do not contribute heat to the interior of a building. Other conversion factors or expressions are possible. The average delivered electricity Net+PV−External equals the total over the time period divided by the number of hours (H) in that time period.

$\begin{matrix} {\overset{\_}{{Net} + {PV} - {External}} = \frac{{Net} + {PV} - {External}}{H}} & (11) \end{matrix}$

Solar Heating Gains

Solar energy that enters through windows, doors, and other openings in a building as sunlight will heat the interior. Solar heating gains Q^(Gains-Solar) (step 53) equal the amount of heat delivered to a building from the sun. In the northern hemisphere, Q^(Gains-Solar) can be estimated based on the south-facing window area (m²) times the solar heating gain coefficient (SHGC) times a shading factor; together, these terms are represented by the effective window area (W). Solar heating gains Q^(Gains-Solar) equal the product of W, the average direct vertical irradiance (DVI) available on a south-facing surface (Solar, as represented by DVI in kW/m²), and the number of hours (H) in the time period. For instance, using a conversion factor from kWh to Btu of 3,412 Btu per kWh (since Q^(Gains-Solar) is in units of Btu while average solar is in kW/m²), solar heating gains Q^(Gains-Solar) equal:

$\begin{matrix} {Q^{{Gains} - {Solar}} = {\left( \overset{\_}{Solar} \right)\mspace{11mu} (W)\mspace{11mu} (H)\mspace{11mu} \left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{kWh} \right)}} & (12) \end{matrix}$

Other conversion factors or expressions are possible.

Note that for reference purposes, the SHGC for one particular high quality window designed for solar gains, the Andersen High-Performance Low-E4 PassiveSun Glass window product, manufactured by Andersen Corporation, Bayport, Minn., is 0.54; many windows have SHGCs that are between 0.20 to 0.25.

Auxiliary Heating Gains

The internal sources of heating gain share the common characteristic of not being operated for the sole purpose of heating a building, yet nevertheless making some measurable contribution to the heat to the interior of a building. The fourth type of heating gain, auxiliary heating gains Q^(Gains-Auxiliary Heating), consumes fuel specifically to provide heat to the building's interior and, as a result, must include conversion efficiency. The gains from auxiliary heating gains Q^(Gains-Auxiliary Heating) (step 53) equal the product of the average hourly fuel consumed Q ^(Fuel) times the hours (H) in the period times HVAC system efficiency η^(HVAC).

Q ^(Gains-Auxiliary Heating)=( Q ^(Fuel))(H)(η^(HVAC))  (13)

Equation (13) can be stated in a more general form that can be applied to both heating and cooling seasons by adding a binary multiplier, HeatOrCool. The binary multiplier HeatOrCool equals 1 when the heating system is in operation and equals −1 when the cooling system is in operation. This more general form will be used in a subsequent section.

Q ^(Gains(Losses)-HVAC)=(HeatOrCool)( Q ^(Fuel))(H)(η^(HVAC))  (14)

Divide Thermal Conductivity into Parts

Consider the situation when the heating system is in operation. The HeatingOrCooling term in Equation (14) equals 1 in the heating season. As illustrated in FIG. 3, a building's thermal conductivity UA^(Total), rather than being treated as a single value, can be conceptually divided into two parts (step 44), with a portion of UA^(Total) allocated to “balance point thermal conductivity” (UA^(Balance Point)) and a portion to “auxiliary heating thermal conductivity” (UA^(Auxiliary Heating)), such as pictorially described supra with reference to FIG. 2. UA^(Balance Point) corresponds to the heating losses that a building can sustain using only internal heating gains Q^(Gains-Internal). This value is related to the concept that a building can sustain a specified balance point temperature in light of internal gains. However, instead of having a balance point temperature, some portion of the building UA^(Balance Point) is considered to be thermally sustainable given heating gains from internal heating sources (Q^(Gains-Internal)). As the rest of the heating losses must be made up by auxiliary heating gains, the remaining portion of the building UA^(Auxiliary Heating) is considered to be thermally sustainable given heating gains from auxiliary heating sources (Q^(Gains-Auxiliary Heating)). The amount of auxiliary heating gained is determined by the setting of the auxiliary heating source's thermostat or other control point. Thus, UA^(Total) can be expressed as:

UA ^(Total) =UA ^(Balance Point) +UA ^(Auxiliary Heating)  (15)

where

UA ^(Balance Point) =UA ^(Occupants) +UA ^(Electric) +UA ^(Solar)  (16)

such that UA^(Occupants), UA^(Electric), and UA^(Solar) respectively represent the thermal conductivity of internal heating sources, specifically, occupants, electric and solar.

In Equation (15), total thermal conductivity UA^(Total) is fixed at a certain value for a building and is independent of weather conditions; UA^(Total) depends upon the building's efficiency. The component parts of Equation (15), balance point thermal conductivity UA^(Balance Point) and auxiliary heating thermal conductivity UA^(Auxiliary Heating), however, are allowed to vary with weather conditions. For example, when the weather is warm, there may be no auxiliary heating in use and all of the thermal conductivity will be allocated to the balance point thermal conductivity UA^(Balance Point) component.

Fuel consumption for heating losses Q^(Losses) can be determined by substituting Equation (15) into Equation (6):

Q ^(Losses)=(UA ^(Balance Point) +UA ^(Auxiliary Heating))( T ^(Indoor) −T ^(Outdoor))(H)  (17)

Balance Energy

Heating gains must equal heating losses for the system to balance (step 45), as further described infra with reference to FIG. 5. Heating energy balance is represented by setting Equation (7) equal to Equation (17):

$\begin{matrix} {{Q^{{Gains} - {Internal}} + Q^{{Gains} - {{Auxilliary}\mspace{14mu} {Heating}}}} = {\left( {{UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} + {UA}^{{Auxilliary}\mspace{14mu} {Heating}}} \right)\mspace{11mu} \left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\mspace{11mu} (H)}} & (18) \end{matrix}$

The result can then be divided by (T ^(Indoor)−T ^(Outdoor))(H), assuming that this term is non-zero:

$\begin{matrix} {{{UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} + {UA}^{{Auxilliary}\mspace{14mu} {Heating}}} = \frac{Q^{{Gains} - {Internal}} + Q^{{Gains} - {{Auxilliary}\mspace{14mu} {Heating}}}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\mspace{14mu} (H)}} & (19) \end{matrix}$

Equation (19) expresses energy balance as a combination of both UA^(Balance Point) and UA^(Auxiliary Heating). FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing a routine 60 for balancing energy for use in the method 40 of FIG. 3. Equation (19) can be further constrained by requiring that the corresponding terms on each side of the equation match, which will divide Equation (19) into a set of two equations:

$\begin{matrix} {{UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} = \frac{Q^{{Gains} - {Internal}}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}} & (20) \\ {{UA}^{{Auxiliary}\mspace{14mu} {Heating}} = \frac{Q^{{Gains} - {{Auxiliary}\mspace{14mu} {Heating}}}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}} & (21) \end{matrix}$

The UA^(Balance Point) should always be a positive value. Equation (20) accomplishes this goal in the heating season. An additional term, HeatOrCool is required for the cooling season that equals 1 in the heating season and −1 in the cooling season.

$\begin{matrix} {{UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} = \frac{({HeatOrCool})\; \left( Q^{{Gains} - {Internal}} \right)}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}} & (22) \end{matrix}$

HeatOrCool and its inverse are the same. Thus, internal gains equals:

Q ^(Gains-Internal)=(HeatOrCool)(UA ^(Balance Point))( T ^(Indoor) −T ^(Outdoor))(H)  (23)

Components of UA^(Balance Point)

For clarity, UA^(Balance Point) can be divided into three component values (step 61) by substituting Equation (8) into Equation (20):

$\begin{matrix} {{UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} = \frac{Q^{{Gains} - {Occupants}} + Q^{{Gains} - {Electric}} + Q^{{Gains} - {Solar}}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}} & (24) \end{matrix}$

Since UA^(Balance Point) equals the sum of three component values (as specified in Equation (16)), Equation (24) can be mathematically limited by dividing Equation (24) into three equations:

$\begin{matrix} {{UA}^{Occupants} = \frac{Q^{{Gains} - {Occupants}}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}} & (25) \\ {{UA}^{Electric} = \frac{Q^{{Gains} - {Electric}}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}} & (26) \\ {{UA}^{Solar} = \frac{Q^{{Gains} - {Solar}}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}} & (27) \end{matrix}$

Solutions for Components of UA^(Balance Point) and UA^(Auxiliary Heating)

The preceding equations can be combined to present a set of results with solutions provided for the four thermal conductivity components as follows. First, the portion of the balance point thermal conductivity associated with occupants UA^(Occupants) (step 62) is calculated by substituting Equation (9) into Equation (25). Next, the portion of the balance point thermal conductivity UA^(Electric) associated with internal electricity consumption (step 63) is calculated by substituting Equation (10) into Equation (26). Internal electricity consumption is the amount of electricity consumed internally in the building and excludes electricity consumed for HVAC operation, pool pump operation, electric water heating, electric vehicle charging, and so on, since these sources of electricity consumption result in heat or work being used external to the inside of the building. The portion of the balance point thermal conductivity UA^(Solar) associated with solar gains (step 64) is then calculated by substituting Equation (12) into Equation (27). Finally, thermal conductivity UA^(Auxiliary Heating) associated with auxiliary heating (step 64) is calculated by substituting Equation (13) into Equation (21).

$\begin{matrix} {{UA}^{Occupants} = \frac{250\; \left( \overset{\_}{P} \right)}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)}} & (28) \\ {{UA}^{Electric} = {\frac{\left( \overset{\_}{{Net} + {PV} - {External}} \right)}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)}\; \left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{kWh} \right)}} & (29) \\ {{UA}^{Solar} = {\frac{\left( \overset{\_}{Solar} \right)\; (W)}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)}\; \left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{kWh} \right)}} & (30) \\ {{UA}^{{Auxiliary}\mspace{14mu} {Heating}} = \frac{{\overset{\_}{Q}}^{Fuel}\eta^{HVAC}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)}} & (31) \end{matrix}$

Determine Fuel Consumption

Referring back to FIG. 3, Equation (31) can used to derive a solution to annual (or periodic) heating fuel consumption. First, Equation (15) is solved for UA^(Auxiliary Heating):

UA ^(Auxiliary Heating) =UA ^(Total) −UA ^(Balance Point)  (32)

Equation (32) is then substituted into Equation (31):

$\begin{matrix} {{{UA}^{Total} - {UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}}} = \frac{{\overset{\_}{Q}}^{Fuel}\eta^{HVAC}}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)}} & (33) \end{matrix}$

Finally, solving Equation (33) for fuel and multiplying by the number of hours (H) in (or duration of) the time period yields:

$\begin{matrix} {Q^{Fuel} = \frac{\left( {{UA}^{Total} - {UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}}} \right)\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}{\eta^{HVAC}}} & (34) \end{matrix}$

Equation (34) is valid during the heating season and applies where UA^(Total)≥UA^(Balance Point). Otherwise, fuel consumption is 0.

Using Equation (34), annual (or periodic) heating fuel consumption Q^(Fuel) can be determined (step 46). The building's thermal conductivity UA^(Total), if already available through, for instance, the results of an energy audit, is obtained. Otherwise, UA^(Total) can be determined by solving Equations (28) through (31) using historical fuel consumption data, such as shown, by way of example, in the table of FIG. 7, or by solving Equation (52), as further described infra. UA^(Total) can also be empirically determined with the approach described, for instance, in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 10,024,733, issued Jul. 17, 2018, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Other ways to determine UA^(Total) are possible. UA^(Balance Point) can be determined by solving Equation (24). The remaining values, average indoor temperature T ^(Indoor) and average outdoor temperature T ^(Outdoor), and HVAC system efficiency η^(HVAC), can respectively be obtained from historical weather data and manufacturer specifications.

Practical Considerations

Equation (34) is empowering. Annual heating fuel consumption Q^(Fuel) can be readily determined without encountering the complications of Equation (1), which is an equation that is difficult to solve due to the number and variety of unknown inputs that are required. The implications of Equation (34) in consumer decision-making, a general discussion, and sample applications of Equation (34) will now be covered.

Change in Fuel Requirements Associated with Decisions Available to Consumers

Consumers have four decisions available to them that affects their energy consumption for heating. FIG. 6 is a process flow diagram showing, by way of example, consumer heating energy consumption-related decision points. These decisions 71 include:

-   -   1. Change the thermal conductivity UA^(Total) by upgrading the         building shell to be more thermally efficient (process 72).     -   2. Reduce or change the average indoor temperature by reducing         the thermostat manually, programmatically, or through a         “learning” thermostat (process 73).     -   3. Upgrade the HVAC system to increase efficiency (process 74).     -   4. Increase the solar gain by increasing the effective window         area (process 75).         Other decisions are possible. Here, these four specific options         can be evaluated supra by simply taking the derivative of         Equation (34) with respect to a variable of interest. The result         for each case is valid where UA^(Total)≥UA^(Balance Point).         Otherwise, fuel consumption is 0.

Changes associated with other internal gains, such as increasing occupancy, increasing internal electric gains, or increasing solar heating gains, could be calculated using a similar approach.

Change in Thermal Conductivity

A change in thermal conductivity UA^(Total) can affect a change in fuel requirements. The derivative of Equation (34) is taken with respect to thermal conductivity, which equals the average indoor minus outdoor temperatures times the number of hours divided by HVAC system efficiency. Note that initial thermal efficiency is irrelevant in the equation. The effect of a change in thermal conductivity UA^(Total) (process 72) can be evaluated by solving:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{{dQ}^{Fuel}}{{dUA}^{Total}} = \frac{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)\; (H)}{\eta^{HVAC}}} & (35) \end{matrix}$

Change in Average Indoor Temperature

A change in average indoor temperature can also affect a change in fuel requirements. The derivative of Equation (34) is taken with respect to the average indoor temperature. Since UA^(Balance Point) is also a function of average indoor temperature, application of the product rule is required. After simplifying, the effect of a change in average indoor temperature (process 73) can be evaluated by solving:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{{dQ}^{Fuel}}{d\overset{\_}{T^{Indoor}}} = {\left( {UA}^{Total} \right)\; \left( \frac{H}{\eta^{HVAC}} \right)}} & (36) \end{matrix}$

Change in HVAC System Efficiency

As well, a change in HVAC system efficiency can affect a change in fuel requirements. The derivative of Equation (34) is taken with respect to HVAC system efficiency, which equals current fuel consumption divided by HVAC system efficiency. Note that this term is not linear with efficiency and thus is valid for small values of efficiency changes. The effect of a change in fuel requirements relative to the change in HVAC system efficiency (process 74) can be evaluated by solving:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{{dQ}^{Fuel}}{d\; \eta^{HVAC}} = {- {Q^{Fuel}\left( \frac{1}{\eta^{HVAC}} \right)}}} & (37) \end{matrix}$

Change in Solar Gains

An increase in solar gains can be accomplished by increasing the effective area of south-facing windows. Effective area can be increased by trimming trees blocking windows, removing screens, cleaning windows, replacing windows with ones that have higher SHGCs, installing additional windows, or taking similar actions. In this case, the variable of interest is the effective window area W. The total gain per square meter of additional effective window area equals the available resource (kWh/m²) divided by HVAC system efficiency, converted to Btus. The derivative of Equation (34) is taken with respect to effective window area. The effect of an increase in solar gains (process 74) can be evaluated by solving:

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{{dQ}^{Fuel}}{d\overset{\_}{W}} = {{- \left\lbrack \frac{\left( \overset{\_}{Solar} \right)\; (H)}{\eta^{HVAC}} \right\rbrack}\; \left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{kWh} \right)}} & (38) \end{matrix}$

Discussion

Both Equations (1) and (34) provide ways to calculate fuel consumption requirements. The two equations differ in several key ways:

-   -   1. UA^(Total) only occurs in one place in Equation (34), whereas         Equation (1) has multiple indirect and non-linear dependencies         to UA^(Total).     -   2. UA^(Total) is divided into two parts in Equation (34), while         there is only one occurrence of UA^(Total) in Equation (1).     -   3. The concept of balance point thermal conductivity in         Equation (34) replaces the concept of balance point temperature         in Equation (1).     -   4. Heat from occupants, electricity consumption, and solar gains         are grouped together in Equation (34) as internal heating gains,         while these values are treated separately in Equation (1).

Second, Equations (28) through (31) provide empirical methods to determine both the point at which a building has no auxiliary heating requirements and the current thermal conductivity. Equation (1) typically requires a full detailed energy audit to obtain the data required to derive thermal conductivity. In contrast, Equations (25) through (28), as applied through the first approach, can substantially reduce the scope of an energy audit.

Third, both Equation (4) and Equation (35) provide ways to calculate a change in fuel requirements relative to a change in thermal conductivity. However, these two equations differ in several key ways:

-   -   1. Equation (4) is complex, while Equation (35) is simple.     -   2. Equation (4) depends upon current building thermal         conductivity, balance point temperature, solar savings fraction,         auxiliary heating efficiency, and a variety of other         derivatives. Equation (35) only requires the auxiliary heating         efficiency in terms of building-specific information.

Equation (35) implies that, as long as some fuel is required for auxiliary heating, a reasonable assumption, a change in fuel requirements will only depend upon average indoor temperature (as approximated by thermostat setting), average outdoor temperature, the number of hours (or other time units) in the (heating) season, and HVAC system efficiency. Consequently, any building shell (or envelope) investment can be treated as an independent investment. Importantly, Equation (35) does not require specific knowledge about building construction, age, occupancy, solar gains, internal electric gains, or the overall thermal conductivity of the building. Only the characteristics of the portion of the building that is being replaced, the efficiency of the HVAC system, the indoor temperature (as reflected by the thermostat setting), the outdoor temperature (based on location), and the length of the winter season are required; knowledge about the rest of the building is not required. This simplification is a powerful and useful result.

Fourth, Equation (36) provides an approach to assessing the impact of a change in indoor temperature, and thus the effect of making a change in thermostat setting. Note that Equation (31) only depends upon the overall efficiency of the building, that is, the building's total thermal conductivity UA^(Total), the length of the winter season (in number of hours or other time units), and the HVAC system efficiency; Equation (31) does not depend upon either the indoor or outdoor temperature.

Equation (31) is useful in assessing claims that are made by HVAC management devices, such as the Nest thermostat device, manufactured by Nest Labs, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif., or the Lyric thermostat device, manufactured by Honeywell Int'l Inc., Morristown, N.J., or other so-called “smart” thermostat devices. The fundamental idea behind these types of HVAC management devices is to learn behavioral patterns, so that consumers can effectively lower (or raise) their average indoor temperatures in the winter (or summer) months without affecting their personal comfort. Here, Equation (31) could be used to estimate the value of heating and cooling savings, as well as to verify the consumer behaviors implied by the new temperature settings.

Balance Point Temperature

Before leaving this section, balance point temperature should briefly be discussed. The formulation in this first approach does not involve balance point temperature as an input. A balance point temperature, however, can be calculated to equal the point at which there is no fuel consumption, such that there are no gains associated with auxiliary heating (Q^(Gains-Auxiliary Heating) equals 0) and the auxiliary heating thermal conductivity (UA^(Auxiliary Heating) in Equation (31)) is zero. Inserting these assumptions into Equation (19) and labeling T^(Outdoor) as T^(Balance Point) yields:

Q ^(Gains-Internal) =UA ^(Total)( T ^(Indoor) −T ^(Balance Point))(H)  (39)

Equation (39) simplifies to:

$\begin{matrix} {{{\overset{\_}{T}}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} = {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - \frac{{\overset{\_}{Q}}^{{Gains} - {Internal}}}{{UA}^{Total}}}}{where}{{\overset{\_}{Q}}^{{Gains} - {Internal}} = \frac{Q^{{Gains} - {Internal}}}{H}}} & (40) \end{matrix}$

Equation (40) is identical to Equation (2), except that average values are used for indoor temperature T ^(Indoor), balance point temperature T ^(Balance Point), and fuel consumption for internal heating gains Q ^(Gains-Internal), and that heating gains from occupancy (Q^(Gains-Occupants)), electric (Q^(Gains-Electric)), and solar (Q^(Gains-Solar)) are all included as part of internal heating gains (Q^(Gains-Internal)).

Application: Change in Thermal Conductivity Associated with One Investment

An approach to calculating a new value for total thermal conductivity

^(Total) after a series of M changes (or investments) are made to a building is described in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application, entitled “System and Method for Interactively Evaluating Personal Energy-Related Investments,” Ser. No. 14/294,079, filed Jun. 2, 2014, pending, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. The approach is summarized therein in Equation (41), which provides:

Total = UA Total + ∑ j = 1 M   ( U j - U ^ j )  A j + ρ   c  ( n - n ^ )  V ( 41 )

where a caret symbol (̂) denotes a new value, infiltration losses are based on the density of air (ρ), specific heat of air (c), number of air changes per hour (n), and volume of air per air change (V). In addition, U^(j) and Û^(j) respectively represent the existing and proposed U-values of surface j, and A^(j) represents the surface area of surface j. The volume of the building V can be approximated by multiplying building square footage by average ceiling height. The equation, with a slight restatement, equals:

Total = UA Total + Δ   UA Total   and ( 42 ) Δ   UA Total = ∑ j = 1 M   ( U j - U ^ j )  A j + ρ   c  ( n - n ^ )  V . ( 43 )

If there is only one investment, the m superscripts can be dropped and the change in thermal conductivity UA^(Total) equals the area (A) times the difference of the inverse of the old and new R-values R and R:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; {UA}^{Total}} = {{A\left( {U - \hat{U}} \right)} = {{A\left( {\frac{1}{R} - \frac{1}{\hat{R}}} \right)}.}}} & (44) \end{matrix}$

Fuel Savings

The fuel savings associated with a change in thermal conductivity UA^(Total) for a single investment equals Equation (44) times (35):

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; Q^{Fuel}} = {{\Delta \; {UA}^{Total}\frac{{dQ}^{Fuel}}{{dUA}^{Total}}} = {{A\left( {\frac{1}{R} - \frac{1}{\hat{R}}} \right)}\frac{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)(H)}{\eta^{HVAC}}}}} & (45) \end{matrix}$

where ΔQ^(Fuel) signifies the change in fuel consumption.

Economic Value

The economic value of the fuel savings (Annual Savings) equals the fuel savings times the average fuel price (Price) for the building in question:

$\begin{matrix} {{{{Annual}\mspace{14mu} {Savings}} = {{A\left( {\frac{1}{R} - \frac{1}{\hat{R}}} \right)}\frac{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)(H)}{\eta^{HVAC}}({Price})}}{where}{{Price} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {\frac{{Price}^{NG}}{10^{5}}\mspace{14mu} {if}\mspace{14mu} {price}\mspace{14mu} {has}\mspace{14mu} {units}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} \$ \mspace{14mu} {per}\mspace{14mu} {therm}} \\ {\frac{{Price}^{Electricity}}{3,412}\mspace{14mu} {if}\mspace{14mu} {price}\mspace{14mu} {has}\mspace{14mu} {units}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} \$ \mspace{14mu} {per}\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \end{matrix} \right.}} & (46) \end{matrix}$

where Price^(NG) represents the price of natural gas and Price^(Electricity) represents the price of electricity. Other pricing amounts, pricing conversion factors, or pricing expressions are possible.

Example

Consider an example. A consumer in Napa, Calif. wants to calculate the annual savings associating with replacing a 20 ft² single-pane window that has an R-value of 1 with a high efficiency window that has an R-value of 4. The average temperature in Napa over the 183-day winter period (4,392 hours) from October 1 to March 31 is 50° F. The consumer sets his thermostat at 68° F., has a 60 percent efficient natural gas heating system, and pays $1 per therm for natural gas. How much money will the consumer save per year by making this change?

Putting this information into Equation (46) suggests that he will save $20 per year:

$\begin{matrix} {{{Annual}\mspace{14mu} {Savings}} = {{20\left( {\frac{1}{1} - \frac{1}{4}} \right)\frac{\left( {68 - 50} \right)\left( {4,392} \right)}{0.6}\left( \frac{1}{10^{5}} \right)} = {\$ 20}}} & (47) \end{matrix}$

Application: Validate Building Shell Improvements Savings

Many energy efficiency programs operated by power utilities grapple with the issue of measurement and evaluation (M&E), particularly with respect to determining whether savings have occurred after building shell improvements were made. Equations (28) through (31) can be applied to help address this issue. These equations can be used to calculate a building's total thermal conductivity UA^(Total). This result provides an empirical approach to validating the benefits of building shell investments using measured data.

Equations (28) through (31) require the following inputs:

1) Weather:

-   -   a) Average outdoor temperature (° F.).     -   b) Average indoor temperature (° F.).     -   c) Average direct solar resource on a vertical, south-facing         surface.

2) Fuel and energy:

-   -   a) Average gross indoor electricity consumption.     -   b) Average natural gas fuel consumption for space heating.     -   c) Average electric fuel consumption for space heating.

3) Other inputs:

-   -   a) Average number of occupants.     -   b) Effective window area.     -   c) HVAC system efficiency.

Weather data can be determined as follows. Indoor temperature can be assumed based on the setting of the thermostat (assuming that the thermostat's setting remained constant throughout the time period), or measured and recorded using a device that takes hourly or periodic indoor temperature measurements, such as a Nest thermostat device or a Lyric thermostat device, cited supra, or other so-called “smart” thermostat devices. Outdoor temperature and solar resource data can be obtained from a service, such as Solar Anywhere SystemCheck, cited supra, or the National Weather Service. Other sources of weather data are possible.

Fuel and energy data can be determined as follows. Monthly utility billing records provide natural gas consumption and net electricity data. Gross indoor electricity consumption can be calculated by adding PV production, whether simulated using, for instance, the Solar Anywhere SystemCheck service, cited supra, or measured directly, and subtracting out external electricity consumption, that is, electricity consumption for electric devices that do not deliver all heat that is generated into the interior of the building. External electricity consumption includes electric vehicle (EV) charging and electric water heating. Other types of external electricity consumption are possible. Natural gas consumption for heating purposes can be estimated by subtracting non-space heating consumption, which can be estimated, for instance, by examining summer time consumption using an approach described in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application, entitled “System and Method for Facilitating Implementation of Holistic Zero Net Energy Consumption,” Ser. No. 14/531,933, filed Nov. 3, 2014, pending, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Other sources of fuel and energy data are possible.

Finally, the other inputs can be determined as follows. The average number of occupants can be estimated by the building owner or occupant. Effective window area can be estimated by multiplying actual south-facing window area times solar heat gain coefficient (estimated or based on empirical tests, as further described infra), and HVAC system efficiency can be estimated (by multiplying reported furnace rating times either estimated or actual duct system efficiency), or can be based on empirical tests, as further described infra. Other sources of data for the other inputs are possible.

Consider an example. FIG. 7 is a table 80 showing, by way of example, data used to calculate thermal conductivity. The data inputs are for a sample house in Napa, Calif. based on the winter period of October 1 to March 31 for six winter seasons, plus results for a seventh winter season after many building shell investments were made. (Note the building improvements facilitated a substantial increase in the average indoor temperature by preventing a major drop in temperature during night-time and non-occupied hours.) South-facing windows had an effective area of 10 m² and the solar heat gain coefficient is estimated to be 0.25 for an effective window area of 2.5 m². The measured HVAC system efficiency of 59 percent was based on a reported furnace efficiency of 80 percent and an energy audit-based duct efficiency of 74 percent.

FIG. 8 is a table 90 showing, by way of example, thermal conductivity results for each season using the data in the table 80 of FIG. 7 as inputs into Equations (28) through (31). Thermal conductivity is in units of Btu/h-° F. FIG. 9 is a graph 100 showing, by way of example, a plot of the thermal conductivity results in the table 90 of FIG. 8. The x-axis represents winter seasons for successive years, each winter season running from October 1 to March 31. The y-axis represents thermal conductivity. The results from a detailed energy audit, performed in early 2014, are superimposed on the graph. The energy audit determined that the house had a thermal conductivity of 773 Btu/h-° F. The average result estimated for the first six seasons was 791 Btu/h-° F. A major amount of building shell work was performed after the 2013-2014 winter season, and the results show a 50-percent reduction in heating energy consumption in the 2014-2015 winter season.

Application: Evaluate Investment Alternatives

The results of this work can be used to evaluate potential investment alternatives. FIG. 10 is a graph 110 showing, by way of example, an auxiliary heating energy analysis and energy consumption investment options. The x-axis represents total thermal conductivity, UA^(Total) in units of Btu/hr-° F. The y-axis represents total heating energy. The graph presents the analysis of the Napa, Calif. building from the earlier example, supra, using the equations previously discussed. The three lowest horizontal bands correspond to the heat provided through internal gains 111, including occupants, heat produced by operating electric devices, and solar heating. The solid circle 112 represents the initial situation with respect to heating energy consumption. The diagonal lines 113 a, 113 b, 113 c represent three alternative heating system efficiencies versus thermal conductivity (shown in the graph as building losses). The horizontal dashed line 114 represents an option to improve the building shell and the vertical dashed line 115 represents an option to switch to electric resistance heating. The plain circle 116 represents the final situation with respect to heating energy consumption.

Other energy consumption investment options (not depicted) are possible. These options include switching to an electric heat pump, increasing solar gain through window replacement or tree trimming (this option would increase the height of the area in the graph labeled “Solar Gains”), or lowering the thermostat setting. These options can be compared using the approach described with reference to Equations (25) through (28) to compare the options in terms of their costs and savings, which will help the homeowner to make a wiser investment.

Second Approach: Time Series Fuel Consumption

The previous section presented an annual fuel consumption model. This section presents a detailed time series model. This section also compares results from the two methods and provides an example of how to apply the on-site empirical tests.

Building-Specific Parameters

The building temperature model used in this second approach requires three building parameters: (1) thermal mass; (2) thermal conductivity; and (3) effective window area. FIG. 11 is a functional block diagram showing thermal mass, thermal conductivity, and effective window area relative to a structure 121. By way of introduction, these parameters will now be discussed.

Thermal Mass (M)

The heat capacity of an object equals the ratio of the amount of heat energy transferred to the object and the resulting change in the object's temperature. Heat capacity is also known as “thermal capacitance” or “thermal mass” (122) when used in reference to a building. Thermal mass Q is a property of the mass of a building that enables the building to store heat, thereby providing “inertia” against temperature fluctuations. A building gains thermal mass through the use of building materials with high specific heat capacity and high density, such as concrete, brick, and stone.

The heat capacity is assumed to be constant when the temperature range is sufficiently small. Mathematically, this relationship can be expressed as:

Q _(Δt) =M(T _(t+Δt) ^(Indoor) −T _(t) ^(Indoor))  (48)

where M equals the thermal mass of the building and temperature units T are in ° F. Q is typically expressed in Btu or Joules. In that case, M has units of Btu/° F. Q can also be divided by 1 kWh/3,412 Btu to convert to units of kWh/° F.

Thermal Conductivity (UA^(Total))

The building's thermal conductivity UA^(Total) (123) is the amount of heat that the building gains or losses as a result of conduction and infiltration. Thermal conductivity UA^(Total) was discussed supra with reference to the first approach for modeling annual heating fuel consumption.

Effective Window Area (W)

The effective window area (in units of m²) (124), also discussed in detail supra, specifies how much of an available solar resource is absorbed by the building. Effective window area is the dominant means of solar gain in a typical building during the winter and includes the effect of physical shading, window orientation, and the window's solar heat gain coefficient. In the northern hemisphere, the effective window area is multiplied by the available average direct irradiance on a vertical, south-facing surface (kW/m²), times the amount of time (II) to result in the kWh obtained from the windows.

Energy Gain or Loss

The amount of heat transferred to or extracted from a building (Q) over a time period of Δt is based on a number of factors, including:

-   -   1) Loss (or gain if outdoor temperature exceeds indoor         temperature) due to conduction and infiltration and the         differential between the indoor and outdoor temperatures.     -   2) Gain, when the HVAC system is in the heating mode, or loss,         when the HVAC system is in the cooling mode.     -   3) Gain associated with:         -   a) Occupancy and heat given off by people.         -   b) Heat produced by consuming electricity inside the             building.         -   c) Solar radiation.

Mathematically, Q can be expressed as:

$\begin{matrix} {Q_{\Delta \; t} = {\left\lbrack {\overset{\overset{{Envelope}\mspace{14mu} {Gain}\mspace{14mu} {or}\mspace{14mu} {Loss}}{}}{{UA}^{Total}\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor}} \right)} + \overset{\overset{{Occupancy}\mspace{25mu} {Gain}}{}}{(250)\overset{\_}{P}} + \overset{\overset{{Internal}\mspace{14mu} {Electric}\mspace{14mu} {Gain}}{}}{\overset{\_}{Electric}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)} + \overset{\overset{{Solar}\mspace{14mu} {Gain}}{}}{W\; {\overset{\_}{Solar}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}} + \overset{\overset{{HVAC}\mspace{14mu} {Gain}\mspace{14mu} {or}\mspace{14mu} {Loss}}{}}{({HeatOrCool})R^{HVAC}\eta^{HVAC}\overset{\_}{Status}}} \right\rbrack \Delta \; t}} & (49) \end{matrix}$

where:

-   -   Except as noted otherwise, the bars over the variable names         represent the average value over Δt hours, that is, the duration         of the applicable empirical test. For instance, T ^(Outdoor)         represents the average outdoor temperature between the time         interval of t and t+Δt.     -   UA^(Total) is the thermal conductivity (in units of Btu/hour-°         F.).     -   W is the effective window area (in units of m²).     -   Occupancy Gain is based on the average number of people (P) in         the building during the applicable empirical test (and the heat         produced by those people). The average person is assumed to         produce 250 Btu/hour.     -   Internal Electric Gain is based on heat produced by indoor         electricity consumption (Electric), as averaged over the         applicable empirical test, but excludes electricity for purposes         that do not produce heat inside the building, for instance,         electric hot water heating where the hot water is discarded down         the drain, or where there is no heat produced inside the         building, such as is the case with EV charging.     -   Solar Gain is based on the average available normalized solar         irradiance (Solar) during the applicable empirical test (with         units of kW/m²). This value is the irradiance on a vertical         surface to estimate solar received on windows; global horizontal         irradiance (GHI) can be used as a proxy for this number when W         is allowed to change on a monthly basis.     -   HVAC Gain or Loss is based on whether the HVAC is in heating or         cooling mode (GainOrLoss is 1 for heating and −1 for cooling),         the rating of the HVAC system (R in Btu), HVAC system efficiency         (η^(HVAC), including both conversion and delivery system         efficiency), average operation status (Status) during the         empirical test, a time series value that is either off (0         percent) or on (100 percent),     -   Other conversion factors or expressions are possible.

Energy Balance

Equation (48) reflects the change in energy over a time period and equals the product of the temperature change and the building's thermal mass. Equation (49) reflects the net gain in energy over a time period associated with the various component sources. Equation (48) can be set to equal Equation (49), since the results of both equations equal the same quantity and have the same units (Btu). Thus, the total heat change of a building will equal the sum of the individual heat gain/loss components:

$\begin{matrix} {\overset{\overset{{Total}\mspace{14mu} {Heat}\mspace{14mu} {Change}}{}}{M\left( {T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} - T_{t}^{Indoor}} \right)} = {\left\lbrack {\overset{\overset{{Envelope}\mspace{14mu} {Gain}\mspace{14mu} {or}\mspace{14mu} {Loss}}{}}{{UA}^{Total}\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor}} \right)} + \overset{\overset{{Occupancy}\mspace{25mu} {Gain}}{}}{(250)\overset{\_}{P}} + \overset{\overset{{Internal}\mspace{14mu} {Electric}\mspace{14mu} {Gain}}{}}{\overset{\_}{Electric}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)} + \overset{\overset{{Solar}\mspace{14mu} {Gain}}{}}{W\; {\overset{\_}{Solar}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}} + \overset{\overset{{HVAC}\mspace{14mu} {Gain}\mspace{14mu} {or}\mspace{14mu} {Loss}}{}}{({HeatOrCool})R^{HVAC}\eta^{HVAC}\overset{\_}{Status}}} \right\rbrack \Delta \; t}} & (50) \end{matrix}$

Equation (50) can be used for several purposes. FIG. 12 is a flow diagram showing a computer-implemented method 130 for modeling interval building heating energy consumption in accordance with a further embodiment. Execution of the software can be performed with the assistance of a computer system, such as further described infra with reference to FIG. 26, as a series of process or method modules or steps.

As a single equation, Equation (50) is potentially very useful, despite having five unknown parameters. In this second approach, the unknown parameters are solved by performing a series of short duration empirical tests (step 131), as further described infra with reference to FIG. 14. Once the values of the unknown parameters are found, a time series of indoor temperature data can be constructed (step 132), which will then allow annual fuel consumption to be calculated (step 133) and maximum indoor temperature to be found (step 134). The short duration tests will first be discussed.

Empirically Determining Building- and Equipment-Specific Parameters Using Short Duration Tests

A series of tests can be used to iteratively solve Equation (50) to obtain the values of the unknown parameters by ensuring that the portions of Equation (50) with the unknown parameters are equal to zero. These tests are assumed to be performed when the HVAC is in heating mode for purposes of illustration. Other assumptions are possible.

FIG. 13 is a table 140 showing the characteristics of empirical tests used to solve for the five unknown parameters in Equation (50). The empirical test characteristics are used in a series of sequentially-performed short duration tests; each test builds on the findings of earlier tests to replace unknown parameters with found values.

The empirical tests require the use of several components, including a control for turning an HVAC system ON or OFF, depending upon the test; an electric controllable interior heat source; a monitor to measure the indoor temperature during the test; a monitor to measure the outdoor temperature during the test; and a computer or other computational device to assemble the test results and finding thermal conductivity, thermal mass, effective window area, and HVAC system efficiency of a building based on the findings. The components can be separate units, or could be consolidated within one or more combined units. For instance, a computer equipped with temperature probes could both monitor, record and evaluate temperature findings. FIG. 14 is a flow diagram showing a routine 150 for empirically determining building- and equipment-specific parameters using short duration tests for use in the method 130 of FIG. 12. The approach is to run a serialized series of empirical tests. The first test solves for the building's total thermal conductivity (UA^(Total)) (step 151). The second test uses the empirically-derived value for UA^(Total) to solve for the building's thermal mass (M) (step 152). The third test uses both of these results, thermal conductivity and thermal mass, to find the building's effective window area (W) (step 153). Finally, the fourth test uses the previous three test results to determine the overall HVAC system efficiency (step 145). Consider how to perform each of these tests.

Test 1: Building Thermal Conductivity (UA^(Total))

The first step is to find the building's total thermal conductivity (UA^(Total)) (step 151). Referring back to the table in FIG. 13, this short-duration test occurs at night (to avoid any solar gain) with the HVAC system off (to avoid any gain from the HVAC system), and by having the indoor temperature the same at the beginning and the ending of the test by operating an electric controllable interior heat source, such as portable electric space heaters that operate at 100% efficiency, so that there is no change in the building temperature's at the beginning and at the ending of the test. Thus, the interior heart source must have sufficient heating capacity to maintain the building's temperature state. Ideally, the indoor temperature would also remain constant to avoid any potential concerns with thermal time lags.

These assumptions are input into Equation (50):

$\begin{matrix} {{M(0)} = {\left\lbrack {{{UA}^{Total}\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor}} \right)} + {(250)\overset{\_}{P}} + {\overset{\_}{Electric}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)} + {{W(0)}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)} + {(1)R^{HVAC}{\eta^{HVAC}(0)}}} \right\rbrack \Delta \; t}} & (51) \end{matrix}$

The portions of Equation (51) that contain four of the five unknown parameters now reduce to zero. The result can be solved for UA^(Total):

$\begin{matrix} {{UA}^{Total} = \frac{\left\lbrack {{(250)\overset{\_}{P}} + {\overset{\_}{Electric}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}{\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)}} & (52) \end{matrix}$

where T ^(Indoor) represents the average indoor temperature during the empirical test, T ^(Outdoor) represents the average outdoor temperature during the empirical test, and Electric represents the average number of occupants during the empirical test, and Electric represents average indoor electricity consumption during the empirical test.

Equation (52) implies that the building's thermal conductivity can be determined from this test based on average number of occupants, average power consumption, average indoor temperature, and average outdoor temperature.

Test 2: Building Thermal Mass (M)

The second step is to find the building's thermal mass (M) (step 152). This step is accomplished by constructing a test that guarantees M is specifically non-zero since UA^(Total) is known based on the results of the first test. This second test is also run at night, so that there is no solar gain, which also guarantees that the starting and the ending indoor temperatures are not the same, that is, T_(t+Δt) ^(Indoor)≠T_(t) ^(Indoor) respectively at the outset and conclusion of the test by not operating the HVAC system. These assumptions are input into Equation (50) and solving yields a solution for M:

$\begin{matrix} {M = {\left\lbrack \frac{{{UA}^{Total}\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor}} \right)} + {(250)\overset{\_}{P}} + {\overset{\_}{Electric}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}}{\left( {T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} - T_{t}^{Indoor}} \right)} \right\rbrack \Delta \; t}} & (53) \end{matrix}$

where UA^(Total) represents the thermal conductivity, T ^(Indoor) represents the average indoor temperature during the empirical test, T ^(Outdoor) represents the average outdoor temperature during the empirical test, P represents the average number of occupants during the empirical test, Electric represents average indoor electricity consumption during the empirical test, t represents the time at the beginning of the empirical test, Δt represents the duration of the empirical test, T_(t+Δt) ^(Indoor) represents the ending indoor temperature, T_(t) ^(Indoor) represents the starting indoor temperature, and T_(t+Δt) ^(Indoor)≠T_(t) ^(Indoor).

Test 3: Building Effective Window Area (W)

The third step to find the building's effective window area (W) (step 153) requires constructing a test that guarantees that solar gain is non-zero. This test is performed during the day with the HVAC system turned off. Solving for W yields:

$\begin{matrix} {W = {\left\{ {\left\lbrack \frac{M\left( {T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} - T_{t}^{Indoor}} \right)}{3,412\; \Delta \; t} \right\rbrack - \frac{{UA}^{Total}\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor}} \right)}{3,412} - \frac{(250)\overset{\_}{P}}{3,412} - \overset{\_}{Electric}} \right\} \left\lbrack \frac{1}{\overset{\_}{Solar}} \right\rbrack}} & (54) \end{matrix}$

where M represents the thermal mass, t represents the time at the beginning of the empirical test, Δt represents the duration of the empirical test, T_(t+Δt) ^(Indoor) represents the ending indoor temperature, and T_(t) ^(Indoor) represents the starting indoor temperature, UA^(Total) represents the thermal conductivity, T ^(Indoor) represents the average indoor temperature, T ^(Outdoor) represents the average outdoor temperature, P represents the average number of occupants during the empirical test, Electric represents average electricity consumption during the empirical test, and Solar represents the average solar energy produced during the empirical test.

Test 4: HVAC System Efficiency (η^(Furnace)η^(Delivery))

The fourth step determines the HVAC system efficiency (step 154). Total HVAC system efficiency is the product of the furnace efficiency and the efficiency of the delivery system, that is, the duct work and heat distribution system. While these two terms are often solved separately, the product of the two terms is most relevant to building temperature modeling. This test is best performed at night, so as to eliminate solar gain. Thus:

$\begin{matrix} {{\eta^{HVAC}\left\lbrack {\frac{M\left( {T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} - T_{t}^{Indoor}} \right)}{\Delta \; t} - {{UA}^{Total}\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor}} \right)} - {(250)\overset{\_}{P}} - {\overset{\_}{Electric}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}} \right\rbrack}\left\lbrack \frac{1}{(1)R^{HVAC}\overset{\_}{Status}} \right\rbrack} & (55) \end{matrix}$

where M represents the thermal mass, t represents the time at the beginning of the empirical test, Δt represents the duration of the empirical test, T_(t+Δt) ^(Indoor) represents the ending indoor temperature, and T_(t) ^(Indoor) represents the starting indoor temperature, UA^(Total) represents the thermal conductivity, T ^(Indoor) represents the average indoor temperature, T ^(Outdoor) represents the average outdoor temperature, P represents the average number of occupants during the empirical test, Electric represents average electricity consumption during the empirical test, Status represents the average furnace operation status, and R^(Furnace) represents the rating of the furnace.

Note that HVAC duct efficiency can be determined without performing a duct leakage test if the generation efficiency of the furnace is known. This observation usefully provides an empirical method to measure duct efficiency without having to perform a duct leakage test.

Time Series Indoor Temperature Data

The previous subsection described how to perform a series of empirical short duration tests to determine the unknown parameters in Equation (50). Commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/531,933, cited supra, describes how a building's UA^(Total) can be combined with historical fuel consumption data to estimate the benefit of improvements to a building. While useful, estimating the benefit requires measured time series fuel consumption and HVAC system efficiency data. Equation (50), though, can be used to perform the same analysis without the need for historical fuel consumption data.

Referring back to FIG. 12, Equation (50) can be used to construct time series indoor temperature data (step 132) by making an approximation. Let the time period (Δt) be short (an hour or less), so that the average values are approximately equal to the value at the beginning of the time period, that is, assume T^(Outdoor) ≈T_(t) ^(Outdoor). The average values in Equation (50) can be replaced with time-specific subscripted values and solved to yield the final indoor temperature.

$\begin{matrix} {T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} = {T_{t}^{Indoor} + {{\left\lbrack \frac{1}{M} \right\rbrack\left\lbrack {{{UA}^{Total}\left( {T_{t}^{Outdoor} - T_{t}^{Indoor}} \right)} + {(250)P_{t}} + {{Electric}_{t}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)} + {W\; {{Solar}_{t}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}} + {({HeatOrCool})R^{HVAC}\eta^{HVAC}{Status}_{t}}} \right\rbrack}\Delta \; t}}} & (56) \end{matrix}$

Once T_(t+Δt) ^(Indoor) is known, Equation (56) can be used to solve for T_(t+2Δt) ^(Indoor) and so on.

Importantly, Equation (56) can be used to iteratively construct indoor building temperature time series data with no specific information about the building's construction, age, configuration, number of stories, and so forth. Equation (56) only requires general weather datasets (outdoor temperature and irradiance) and building-specific parameters. The control variable in Equation (56) is the fuel required to deliver the auxiliary heat at time t, as represented in the Status variable, that is, at each time increment, a decision is made whether to run the HVAC system.

Seasonal Fuel Consumption

Equation (50) can also be used to calculate seasonal fuel consumption (step 133) by letting Δt equal the number of hours (H) in the entire season, either heating or cooling (and not the duration of the applicable empirical test), rather than making Δt very short (such as an hour, as used in an applicable empirical test). The indoor temperature at the start and the end of the season can be assumed to be the same or, alternatively, the total heat change term on the left side of the equation can be assumed to be very small and set equal to zero. Rearranging Equation (50) provides:

$\begin{matrix} {{({HeatOrCool})R^{HVAC}\eta^{HVAC}{\overset{\_}{Status}(H)}} = {{{- \left\lbrack {{UA}^{Total}\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor}} \right)} \right\rbrack}(H)} - {\left\lbrack {{(250)\overset{\_}{P}} + {\overset{\_}{Electric}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)} + {W\; {\overset{\_}{Solar}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack (H)}}} & (57) \end{matrix}$

Total seasonal fuel consumption based on Equation (50) can be shown to be identical to fuel consumption calculated using the annual method based on Equation (34). First, Equation (57), which is a rearrangement of Equation (50), can be simplified. Multiplying Equation (57) by HeatOrCool results in (HeatOrCool)² on the left hand side, which equals 1 for both heating and cooling seasons, and can thus be dropped from the equation. In addition, the sign on the first term on the right hand side of Equation (57) ([UA^(Total)(T ^(Outdoor)−T ^(Indoor))](H)) can be changed by reversing the order of the temperatures. Per Equation (8), the second term on the right hand side of the equation

$\left( {\left\lbrack {{(250)\overset{\_}{P}} + {\overset{\_}{Electric}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)} + {W\; {\overset{\_}{Solar}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack (H)} \right)$

equals internal gains (Q^(Gains-Internal)), which can be substituted into Equation (57). Finally, dividing the equation by HVAC efficiency η^(HVAC) yields:

$\begin{matrix} {{R^{HVAC}{\overset{\_}{Status}(H)}} = {\left\lbrack {{({HeatOrCool})\left( {UA}^{Total} \right)\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)(H)} - {({HeatOrCool})Q^{{Gains} - {Internal}}}} \right\rbrack \left( \frac{1}{\eta^{HVAC}} \right)}} & (58) \end{matrix}$

Equation (58), which is a simplification of Equation (57), can be used to calculate net savings in fuel, cost, and carbon emissions (environmental), as described, for instance, in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application, entitled “System and Method for Estimating Indoor Temperature Time Series Data of a Building with the Aid of a Digital Computer,” Ser. No. 15/096,185, filed Apr. 11, 2016, pending, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Next, substituting Equation (23) into Equation (58):

$\begin{matrix} {{R^{HVAC}{\overset{\_}{Status}(H)}} = {\left\lbrack {{({HeatOrCool})\left( {UA}^{Total} \right)\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)(H)} - {({HeatOrCool})({HeatOrCool})\left( {UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} \right)\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)(H)}} \right\rbrack \left( \frac{1}{\eta^{HVAC}} \right)}} & (59) \end{matrix}$

Once again, HeatOrCool² equals 1 for both heating and cooling seasons and thus is dropped. Equation (59) simplifies as:

$\begin{matrix} {{R^{HVAC}{\overset{\_}{Status}(H)}} = \frac{\begin{matrix} \left\lbrack {{{HeatOrCool}\left( {UA}^{Total} \right)} - \left( {UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}} \right)} \right\rbrack \\ {\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)(H)} \end{matrix}}{\eta^{HVAC}}} & (60) \end{matrix}$

Consider the heating season when HeatOrCool equals 1. Equation (60) simplifies as follows.

$\begin{matrix} {Q^{Fuel} = \frac{\left( {{UA}^{Total} - {UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}}} \right)\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor}} \right)(H)}{\eta^{HVAC}}} & (61) \end{matrix}$

Equation (61) illustrates total seasonal fuel consumption based on Equation (50) is identical to fuel consumption calculated using the annual method based on Equation (34).

Consider the cooling season when HeatOrCool equals −1. Multiply Equation (61) by the first part of the right hand side by −1 and reverse the temperatures, substitute −1 for HeatOrCool, and simplify:

$\begin{matrix} {Q^{Fuel} = \frac{\left( {{UA}^{Total} + {UA}^{{Balance}\mspace{14mu} {Point}}} \right)\left( {{\overset{\_}{T}}^{Outdoor} - {\overset{\_}{T}}^{Indoor}} \right)(H)}{\eta^{HVAC}}} & (62) \end{matrix}$

A comparison of Equations (61) and (62) shows that a leverage effect occurs that depends upon whether the season is for heating or cooling. Fuel requirements are decreased in the heating season because internal gains cover a portion of building losses (Equation (61)). Fuel requirements are increased in the cooling season because cooling needs to be provided for both the building's temperature gains and the internal gains (Equation (62)).

Maximum Indoor Temperature

Allowing consumers to limit the maximum indoor temperature to some value can be useful from a personal physical comfort perspective. The limit of maximum indoor temperature (step 134) can be obtained by taking the minimum of T_(t+Δt) ^(Indoor) and T^(Indoor-Max), the maximum indoor temperature recorded for the building during the heating season. There can be some divergence between the annual and detailed time series methods when the thermal mass of the building is unable to absorb excess heat, which can then be used at a later time. Equation (56) becomes Equation (63) when the minimum is applied.

$\begin{matrix} {T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} = {{Min}\left\{ {T^{{Indoor} - {Max}},{T_{t}^{Indoor} + {{\left\lbrack \frac{1}{M} \right\rbrack \left\lbrack {{{UA}^{Total}\left( {T_{t}^{Outdoor} - T_{t}^{Indoor}} \right)} + {(250)P_{t}} + {{Electric}_{t}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)} + {W\; {{Solar}_{t}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}} + {({HeatOrCool})R^{HVAC}\eta^{HVAC}{Status}_{t}}} \right\rbrack}\Delta \; t}}} \right\}}} & (63) \end{matrix}$

Using a Building's Thermal Mass to Shift HVAC Loads

Well-intentioned, albeit naïve, attempts at lowering energy costs by manually adjusting thermostat settings are usually ineffective in achieving appreciable savings. In a typical house, HVAC load is not directly measured. As a result, the cost savings resulting from manual thermostat changes cannot be accurately gauged for lack of a direct correlation between HVAC use and power consumption. A change in thermostat setting often fails to translate into a proportional decrease in energy expense, especially when HVAC use remains high during periods of increased utility rates.

Conversely, while HVAC load remains an unknown, indoor temperatures can be estimated. As discussed supra with reference to FIG. 12, Equation (50) can be used to construct time series indoor temperature data. This data can be used to shift HVAC load to meet energy savings goals. HVAC load is shifted by adjusting HVAC consumption that, in turn, affects indoor temperatures. HVAC load shifting advantageously harnesses the thermal storage that exists due to a building's thermal mass by pre-heating or pre-cooling the structure. When performing HVAC load shifting, HVAC consumption is adjusted to reduce or flatten peak energy consumption loads, to move HVAC consumption from high cost to low cost periods, or to match HVAC consumption with PV production. Other energy savings goals are possible. Thus, by storing indoor climate conditioning through thermal mass, an HVAC system can be run at an increased load at those times when energy costs are lower, thereby decreasing overall energy expense.

Equation (56) states that the indoor temperature in a subsequent time period equals the indoor temperature in the current time period plus the total heat change divided by thermal mass. Alternatively, Equation (56) can be written as the sum of five sources of heat gain (or loss), envelope gains (or losses), occupancy gains, internal electric gains, solar gains, and HVAC gains (or losses):

$\begin{matrix} {T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} = {T_{t}^{Indoor} + \left\lbrack \frac{\begin{matrix} {{Envelope}_{t} + {Occupancy}_{t} +} \\ {{{Internal}\mspace{14mu} {Electric}_{t}} + {{Solar}\mspace{14mu} {Energy}_{t}} + {HVAC}_{t}} \end{matrix}}{M} \right\rbrack}} & (64) \\ {\mspace{79mu} {{such}\mspace{14mu} {that}\text{:}}} & \; \\ {\mspace{79mu} {{{Envelope}_{t} = {{{UA}^{Total}\left( {T_{t}^{Outdoor} - T_{t}^{Indoor}} \right)}\Delta \; t}}\mspace{20mu} {{Occupancy}_{t} = {(250)P_{t}\Delta \; t}}\mspace{20mu} {{{Internal}\mspace{14mu} {Electric}_{t}} = {{{Electric}_{t}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}\Delta \; t}}\mspace{20mu} {{{Solar}\mspace{14mu} {Energy}_{t}} = {W\; {{Solar}_{t}\left( \frac{3,412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}}{1\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}\Delta \; t}}\mspace{20mu} {{HVAC}_{t} = {{HeatOrCool}\; \eta^{HVAC}L_{t}^{HVAC}}}\mspace{20mu} {L_{t}^{HVAC} = {R^{HVAC}{Status}_{t}\Delta \; t}}}} & (65) \end{matrix}$

where L_(t) ^(HVAC) equals the HVAC load (kWh) consumed at time t over the time interval Δt. Envelope is the only source of heat that depends on indoor temperature. Thus, Envelope represents the only dependent source heat gain (or loss) of the five sources of heat gain (or loss) presented in Equation (64). All other sources heat gain (or loss) are independent of each other and are independent of indoor temperature. This independence means that changing the values of Occupancy, Internal Electric, Solar Energy, or HVAC only impacts the value of Envelope. The values of the other sources are unaffected.

Residential applications typically only have one electric meter that measures net load, even when a PV system is installed. As a result, several terms and load relationships need to be defined to obtain HVAC load. There are five load components, total load L^(Total), HVAC load L^(HVAC), non-HVAC load L^(Non-HVAC), net load L^(Net) and PV production PV. Note that the non-HVAC load can be estimated by examining historical usage under different weather patterns.

These load definitions can be combined to express HVAC load. First, total load L_(t) ^(Total) at any given time t equals net load L_(t) ^(Net) plus PV production PV_(t):

L _(t) ^(Total) =L _(t) ^(Net) +PV _(t)  (66)

Note that the total (gross) load L^(Total) can be estimated, such as described in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/531,940, cited supra. Next, total load L^(Total) at time t can be expressed as the sum of HVAC load L_(t) ^(HVAC) and non-HVAC load L_(t) ^(Non-HVAC):

L _(t) ^(Total) =L _(t) ^(HVAC) +L _(t) ^(Non-HVAC)  (67)

Finally, HVAC load can be obtained by setting Equation (66) equal to Equation (67) and solving for HVAC load L_(t) ^(HVAC). At time t, HVAC load L_(t) ^(HVAC) equals net load L_(t) ^(Net) plus PV production PV_(t) minus non-HVAC load L_(t) ^(Non-HVAC):

L _(t) ^(HVAC) =L _(t) ^(Net) +PV _(t) −L _(t) ^(Non-HVAC)  (68)

Equation (68) provides that HVAC load can be calculated using net load, measured (or simulated) PV production, and estimated non-HVAC load.

Equations (66), (67), and (68) are for an existing, single value at time t. Notationally, a caret symbol (A) signifies a modified scenario value. The Greek letter delta (A) signifies a change between a modified scenario value and an existing scenario values. For example, the change in HVAC load at time t is represented by Δ_(t) ^(HVAC), which equals ΔL_(t) ^(HVAC)=

−L_(t) ^(HVAC). Array of values are denoted by dropping the subscript for time t and using a bold font. For example, the array of change in HVAC loads equals ΔL^(HVAC)={ΔL₀ ^(HVAC), ΔL₁ ^(HVAC), . . . , ΔL_(T) ^(HVAC)}, where Δt equals 1 and the time starts at 0 and goes to T. Similarly, the change in indoor temperatures equals ΔT^(Indoor)={ΔT₀ ^(Indoor), ΔT₁ ^(Indoor), . . . , ΔT_(T) ^(Indoor)}.

Change in Indoor Temperature

The change in indoor temperature for any given time t can be calculated by subtracting existing scenario values from modified scenario values, using Equation (64) to calculate both existing (T_(t) ^(Indoor)) and modified ({circumflex over (T)}_(t) ^(Indoor)) indoor temperatures. Assuming that only the HVAC load is modified, the change in indoor temperature can be calculated as:

$\mspace{20mu} {{\hat{T}}_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} = {{{\hat{T}}_{t}^{Indoor} + \left\lbrack \frac{\begin{matrix} {{{En}{pe}_{t}} + {Occupancy}_{t} +} \\ {{{Internal}\mspace{14mu} {Electric}_{t}} + {{Solar}\mspace{14mu} {Energy}_{t}} + {C_{t}}} \end{matrix}}{M} \right\rbrack  - T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor}} = {T_{t}^{Indoor} + \left\lbrack \frac{\begin{matrix} {{Envelope}_{t} + {Occupancy}_{t} +} \\ {{{Internal}\mspace{14mu} {Electric}_{t}} + {{Solar}\mspace{14mu} {Energy}_{t}} + {HVAC}_{t}} \end{matrix}}{M} \right\rbrack}}}$ $T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} = {{\Delta \; T_{t}^{Indoor}} + \left\lbrack \frac{\left( {{{En}{pe}_{t}} - {Envelope}_{t}} \right) + \left( {{C_{t}} - {HVAC}_{t}} \right)}{M} \right\rbrack}$

The terms for Occupancy, Internal Electric, and Solar Energy all cancel out because these terms are the same for both existing and modified scenarios. By substituting the Envelope and HVAC definitions from Equation (64), the change in indoor temperature resulting from a change in HVAC operation equals:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor}} = {{\Delta \; T_{t}^{Indoor}} - {\left( {{{UA}^{Total}\Delta \; T_{t}^{Indoor}} + {\Delta \; t} + {{HeatOrCool}\; \eta^{HVAC}\Delta \; L_{t}^{HVAC}}} \right)\left( \frac{1}{M} \right)}}} & (69) \end{matrix}$

Equation (69) can be arranged as follows.

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor}} = {\left\lbrack {{\left( {M - {{UA}^{Total}\Delta \; t}} \right)\Delta \; T_{t}^{Indoor}} - \left( {{HeatOrCool}\; \eta^{HVAC}\Delta \; L_{t}^{HVAC}} \right)} \right\rbrack \left( \frac{1}{M} \right)}} & (70) \end{matrix}$

Equation (70) can be rearranged such that the change in temperature for the previous time period is based on the data for the subsequent time period:

$\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \; T_{t}^{Indoor}} = \frac{{M\; \Delta \; T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor}} + \left( {{HeatOrCool}\; \eta^{HVAC}\Delta \; L_{t}^{HVAC}} \right)}{M - {{UA}^{Total}\Delta \; t}}} & (71) \end{matrix}$

Equations (70) and (71) allow the change in indoor temperature to be iteratively calculated respectively starting either at the beginning of the HVAC load shifting strategy and working forward (Equation (70)) or at the end of the HVAC load shifting strategy and working backward (Equation (71)). When working forward from the beginning of the time period, each change in indoor temperature applies to the next time interval in the time period following the change in HVAC load. When working backward from the ending of the time period, each change in indoor temperature applies to the prior time interval in the time period preceding the change in HVAC load.

In both Equations (70) and (71), two change in indoor temperature boundary conditions must be satisfied:

-   -   1. The change in temperature at the start of the HVAC load         shifting strategy equals zero

(Δ T_(t^(Start))^(Indoor) = 0).

-   -   2. The change in temperature Δt time after the end of the HVAC         load shifting strategy equals zero

(Δ T_(t^(End) + Δ t)^(Indoor) = 0).

Equations (70) and (71) are only reliant on a change in HVAC load coupled with three static parameters, thermal mass, HVAC efficiency, and thermal conductivity. In addition, Equations (70) and (71) can be solved iteratively to determine a new HVAC load shape, which defines HVAC consumption, and indoor temperature profile. Equations (70) and (71) are independent of external temperature, non-HVAC load, occupancy, and solar irradiance, which are required inputs for current load shifting solutions.

Constrained Cost Minimization Problem

The problem of minimizing the cost associated with net load (

) can be formulated as a constrained cost minimization problem by shifting HVAC load (

) during an adjustment time period, subject to several constraints. First, throughout the time period, the HVAC load is subject to operational constraints in that the HVAC load must always be positive, that is, non-negative, and must not exceed the HVAC equipment rating. Second, Equation (71) can be used to guarantee that the two change in indoor temperature boundary conditions at the beginning and ending of the time period are satisfied:

$\begin{matrix} {{Cost}} & (72) \end{matrix}$

such that 0≤

≤HVAC Rating for all t,

Δ T_(t^(Start))^(Indoor) = 0,

and

Δ T_(t^(End) + Δ t)^(Indoor) = 0.

Optionally, the indoor temperature can be constrained to not change beyond some specified range, such that −ΔT^(Indoor Min)≤ΔT_(t) ^(Indoor)≤ΔT^(Indoor Max) for all t. Still other constraints are possible.

Change in Losses

The increase in envelope losses associated with extra cooling or the decrease in envelope losses associated with extra heating can be calculated to examine changes in total energy use. These values equal the building's total thermal conductivity times the average change in temperature times the number of hours:

$\begin{matrix} {{{Change}\mspace{14mu} {in}\mspace{14mu} {Losses}} = {\left( {UA}^{Total} \right)\left( \overset{\_}{\Delta \; T_{t^{Start}\; {to}\mspace{11mu} t^{End}}^{Indoor}} \right)\left( {t^{End} - t^{Start}} \right)}} & (73) \end{matrix}$

where

$\overset{\_}{\Delta \; T_{t^{Start}\; {to}\mspace{11mu} t^{End}}^{Indoor}}$

represents the average change in indoor temperature.

Implementation

Equation (71) requires time series change in HVAC load data (ΔL^(HVAC)) as an input HVAC load shape and generates time series change in indoor temperature data (ΔT^(Indoor)) as an output indoor temperature profile. The time series change in HVAC load data is used as modified scenario values to meet desired energy savings goals, such as reducing or flattening peak energy consumption load to reduce demand charges, moving HVAC consumption to take advantage of lower utility rates, or moving HVAC consumption to match PV production. Still other energy savings goals are possible. FIG. 15 is a flow diagram showing a method for providing constraint-based HVAC system optimization 160 with the aid of a digital computer. Execution of the software can be performed with the assistance of a computer system, such as further described infra with reference to FIG. 26, as a series of process or method modules or steps. The change in HVAC load can be constructed using the following steps.

First, time series net load data (L^(Net)) is obtained (step 161) for a time period during which HVAC load for the building will be shifted. The time series net load data can be measured, simulated, or forecasted. If a PV production system (or other type of renewable resource power production system) is installed on-site (step 162), time series PV production data for the building (PV) is obtained (step 163) and added to the time series net load data to equal time series total load data for the building (L^(Total)) (step 164). The time series PV production data can also be measured, forecasted, or simulated, such as described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,165,811; 8,165,812; 8,165,813, all issued to Hoff on Apr. 24, 2012; U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,326,535 and 8,326,536, both issued to Hoff on Dec. 4, 2012; and U.S. Pat. No. 8,335,649, issued to Hoff on Dec. 18, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference. Otherwise, the time series total load data for the building (L^(Total)) is simply set to equal the time series net load data (L^(Net)) (step 165). Time series non-HVAC load data (L^(Non-HVAC)) is estimated (step 166). The time series non-HVAC load data can be estimated by examining historical usage under different weather patterns. The time series non-HVAC load data is subtracted from the time series total load data to equal time series HVAC load data (L^(HVAC)) (step 167).

Next, a HVAC load shifting strategy that satisfies the constrained optimization is selected (step 168). In choosing the strategy, the proposed adjustments to the existing HVAC load data ΔL^(HVAC) must be selected to satisfy the two change in indoor temperature boundary conditions bounded at the beginning and ending of the time period during which HVAC load will be shifted. In addition, the change in HVAC load data should preferably be constructed within the context of existing net energy consumption, as indicated by the constrained cost minimization problem outline in Equation (72). Based on these considerations, modified time series net load data (

) is constructed (step 169) by modifying the existing time series HVAC load data (L^(HVAC)) to match the selected HVAC load shifting strategy.

Next, if a PV production system (or other type of renewable resource power production system) is installed on-site (step 170), the existing time series PV production data for the building (PV) is added to and the existing time series non-HVAC load data (L^(Non-HVAC)) is subtracted from the modified time series net load data (

) to equal modified time series HVAC load data (

) (step 171). Otherwise, only the existing time series non-HVAC load data (L^(Non-HVAC)) is subtracted from the modified time series net load data (

) to equal the modified time series HVAC load data (

) (step 172).

Finally, time series change in HVAC load data (ΔL^(HVAC)) is calculated by subtracting the modified time series HVAC load data (

) from the existing time series non-HVAC load data (L^(Non-HVAC)) (step 173). Time series change in indoor temperature data (ΔT^(Indoor)) is then constructed (step 174) by iteratively applying Equation (70) starting at the beginning of the time period for the HVAC load shifting strategy and working forward or by iteratively applying Equation (71) at the ending of the time period for the HVAC load shifting strategy and working backward. The modified time series HVAC load data (

) and the time series change in indoor temperature data (ΔT^(Indoor)) are evaluated to verify that all conditions are satisfied (step 175). Specifically, the following conditions must be met:

1. Modified HVAC load is never negative.

2. Modified HVAC load never exceeds HVAC equipment ratings.

3. The indoor temperature boundary conditions are satisfied.

If any of the conditions are not satisfied (step 175), a new (or revised) HVAC load shifting strategy is selected and vetted (steps 168-174) until all conditions are met (step 175), after which the method is complete.

Example: Pre-Cooling in the Summer

The foregoing methodology can be illustrated by generating exemplary results using data measured on Sep. 10, 2015 for an actual house located in Napa, Calif., based on air conditioning (A/C) usage in the summer. This day was the peak load day for the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) and was also the hottest day of the year in Napa, Calif. The house has a 10 kW PV system and an A/C system rated a 13 SEER, which corresponds to an “efficiency” of 381%. The SEER rating is converted into efficiency by multiplying by the Btu-to-Wh conversion factor, that is,

$3.81 = {\frac{13\mspace{14mu} {Btu}\text{/}{Wh}}{3.412\mspace{14mu} {Btu}\text{/}{Wh}}.}$

The house has a thermal conductivity UA^(Total) of 1,600 Btu/hr-° F., that is, 0.47 kWh/hr-° F., and a thermal mass M of 25,000 Btu/° F., that is, 7.33 kWh/° F. Assume that a demand charge of $20 per kW per month was assessed based on the peak demand during the period of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and that electricity cost was $0.10 per kWh.

To minimize the demand charge, the cost minimization problem in Equation (72) suggests a strategy of shifting HVAC load to obtain the lowest possible constant net load from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., taking into account PV production. The question becomes how will such a strategy change the indoor temperature? FIG. 16 is a table 180 showing, by way of example, data and calculations used in the example house for the peak load day of Sep. 10, 2015. The data is grouped under categories of Existing, Modified, and Change. The Existing category presents measured hourly outdoor temperature, indoor temperature, and total load without PV production (L^(Total)). PV production data was obtained for a 10 kW PV system using data measured from a nearby location. Alternatively, the PV production data could have been obtained using simulation algorithms, such as described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,165,811, 8,165,812, 8,165,813, 8,326,535, 8,326,536, and 8,335,649, cited supra. PV production is subtracted from the total load to obtain net load (L^(Net)). Non-HVAC load was estimated and subtracted from the total load to obtain HVAC load (L^(HVAC)).

The Modified category presents modified total load (

) and modified net load (

). In this example, the goal was to flatten the net load with PV production throughout the HVAC load shifting period. This goal was achieved by selecting the lowest practicable constant net load during the HVAC load shifting period with the change in temperature equaling 0 at the boundary conditions. A constant net load of 3.10 kW satisfied this requirement. The change in indoor temperature was added to the existing indoor temperature to obtain the modified indoor temperature. Note that calculating the modified indoor temperature is not required for the analysis, but is included for purposes of illustration.

Focus, for the moment, on the Change category, especially the highlighted area in the table. Equation (71) was iteratively applied to calculate the change in indoor temperature as a function of the modified HVAC load. Equation (71) has two inputs, the change in HVAC load in the current hour and the change in indoor temperature in the next hour.

The second boundary condition requires that, by definition, the change in temperature immediately after the end of the pre-cooling period at 9:00 p.m. equals 0, that is, ΔT₂₁ ^(Indoor)=0. Sufficient information now exists to iteratively apply Equation (71) starting at 8:00 p.m, such that the change in indoor temperature at 8:00 p.m. equals

${{- 0.54}{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} = {\frac{{\left( {7.33\mspace{14mu} {kWh}\text{/}{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} \right)\left( {0{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} \right)} + {(3.81)\left( {{- 0.97}\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}}{\left( {7.33\mspace{14mu} {kWh}\text{/}{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} \right) - {\left( {{0.47\mspace{14mu} {kWh}\text{/}{hr}} - {{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}}} \right)\left( {1\mspace{14mu} {hr}} \right)}}.}$

Next, Equation (71) can be applied at 7:00 p.m., such that the change in indoor temperature at 7:00 p.m. equals

${{- 0.34}{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} = {\frac{{\left( {7.33\mspace{14mu} {kWh}\text{/}{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} \right)\left( {{- 0.54}{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} \right)} + {(3.81)\left( {0.42\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} \right)}}{\left( {7.33\mspace{14mu} {kWh}\text{/}{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} \right) - {\left( {{0.47\mspace{14mu} {kWh}\text{/}{hr}} - {{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}}} \right)\left( {1\mspace{14mu} {hr}} \right)}}.}$

This process of iteratively applying Equation (71) to determining the change in indoor temperature for the preceding hour is repeated until 8:00 a.m., when the change in indoor temperature again equals 0, which satisfies the first boundary condition.

Many possible changes in HVAC load patterns exist that could satisfy the first boundary condition. Here, this initial boundary condition was satisfied by setting the change in HVAC load to flatten the net load. FIG. 17 is a set of graphs 190 showing, by way of example, existing and modified total loads, net loads, and indoor and outdoor temperatures with 0.0, 5.0, or 10.0 kW of PV production. In the first and second columns, the x-axes represent time of day and the y-axes represent load in kWh. In the third column, the x-axes represent time of day and the y-axes represent indoor and outdoor temperatures in F°. The third row of graphs summarizes the results of the analysis. The graph on the left presents total load. The middle graph presents net load. The right graph presents the indoor and outdoor temperatures. The solid lines are the existing load and the dashed lines are the modified loads. Referring back to FIG. 16, the bottom rows of the table show that peak demand for Existing total load was 9.57 kW, peak demand for Existing net load was 6.40 kW, and peak demand for Modified net load was 3.10 kW. PV production reduces peak demand by 3.17 kW and HVAC load shifting reduces demand by an additional 3.30 kW. The average temperature change over the 13-hour period was −2.40° F. According to Equation (73), the increased losses should equal

${3.85\mspace{14mu} {kWh}} = {\left( {0.47\mspace{14mu} \frac{kWh}{{hr} - {{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}}}} \right)\left( {2.40{^\circ}\mspace{14mu} {F.}} \right){\left( {13\mspace{14mu} {hours}} \right)/{3.81.}}}$

Existing A/C consumed 73.67 kWh and Modified A/C consumed 77.52 kWh. Thus, the Modified strategy increased A/C consumption by 3.85 kWh, or 5%, verifying that the results are as expected.

Economic Benefit

Consider the economic benefit of this HVAC load shifting strategy. Here, there would have been an additional economic benefit of $62 if the peak demand reduction of 3.10 kW was consistent throughout the entire month ($62.00=$20.00/kW×3.10 kW). Suppose that the HVAC load shifting strategy needed to be applied 10 days out of a 30-day month with the same amount of energy required each day to achieve the peak load reduction. This strategy would have cost $3.85 in extra energy charges, that is, $3.85=10 days×3.85 kWh/day×$0.10/kWh) with a net benefit of $58.15 saved. Thus, the HVAC load shifting strategy would have resulted in a significant economic benefit.

The results change as a function of PV system size. Comparing the results based on PV system size, the HVAC load shifting strategy almost doubles the peak load reduction relative to PV production alone. The specific strategy is dependent upon PV production.

Example: Pre-Heating in the Winter

The previous example was applied to summer conditions. Results are also applicable to winter conditions. The following example is for the coldest day of the year in the winter, Dec. 27, 2015, for an efficient house located in Napa, Calif. with a thermal conductivity of 400 Btu/hr-T, 20,000 Btu/° F. thermal mass that used electric baseboard heating with 100% heater efficiency. The cost-minimization goal was to flatten the net load starting at 9:00 a.m. on the day prior to the coldest day. FIG. 18 is a set of graphs 200 showing, by way of example, existing and modified loads, net loads, and indoor and outdoor temperatures with 10.0 kW of PV production. In the first and second columns, the x-axes represent time of day and the y-axes represent load in kWh. In the third column, the x-axes represent time of day and the y-axes represent indoor and outdoor temperatures in F°. There was an indoor temperature increase because the building needed to be pre-heated during the day to maintain acceptable temperatures on the following morning. The average increase in temperature was 1.4° F. over the 24-hour period. A peak increase of 2.8° F. occurred in the early afternoon. Energy consumed for heating for the day increased from 40 kWh to 44 kWh, which represents a 10% increase. The results suggest that the pre-cooling strategy described in the previous example also works as a pre-heating strategy in the winter.

Comparison to Annual Method (First Approach)

Two different approaches to calculating annual fuel consumption are described herein. The first approach, per Equation (34), is a single-line equation that requires six inputs. The second approach, per Equation (63), constructs a time series dataset of indoor temperature and HVAC system status. The second approach considers all of the parameters that are indirectly incorporated into the first approach. The second approach also includes the building's thermal mass and the specified maximum indoor temperature, and requires hourly time series data for the following variables: outdoor temperature, solar resource, internal electricity consumption, and occupancy.

Both approaches were applied to the exemplary case, discussed supra, for the sample house in Napa, Calif. Thermal mass was 13,648 Btu/° F. and the maximum temperature was set at 72° F. The auxiliary heating energy requirements predicted by the two approaches was then compared. FIG. 19 is a graph 210 showing, by way of example, a comparison of auxiliary heating energy requirements determined by the hourly approach versus the annual approach. The x-axis represents total thermal conductivity, UA^(Total) in units of Btu/hr-° F. The y-axis represents total heating energy. FIG. 19 uses the same format as the graph in FIG. 10 by applying a range of scenarios. The red line in the graph corresponds to the results of the hourly method. The dashed black line in the graph corresponds to the annual method. The graph suggests that results are essentially identical, except when the building losses are very low and some of the internal gains are lost due to house overheating, which is prevented in the hourly method, but not in the annual method.

The analysis was repeated using a range of scenarios with similar results. FIG. 20 is a graph 220 showing, by way of example, a comparison of auxiliary heating energy requirements with the allowable indoor temperature limited to 2° F. above desired temperature of 68° F. Here, the only cases that found any meaningful divergence occurred when the maximum house temperature was very close to the desired indoor temperature. FIG. 21 is a graph 230 showing, by way of example, a comparison of auxiliary heating energy requirements with the size of effective window area tripled from 2.5 m² to 7.5 m². Here, internal gains were large by tripling solar gains and there was insufficient thermal mass to provide storage capacity to retain the gains.

The conclusion is that both approaches yield essentially identical results, except for cases when the house has inadequate thermal mass to retain internal gains (occupancy, electric, and solar).

Example

How to perform the tests described supra using measured data can be illustrated through an example. These tests were performed between 9 PM on Jan. 29, 2015 to 6 AM on Jan. 31, 2015 on a 35 year-old, 3,000 ft² house in Napa, Calif. This time period was selected to show that all of the tests could be performed in less than a day-and-a-half. In addition, the difference between indoor and outdoor temperatures was not extreme, making for a more challenging situation to accurately perform the tests.

FIG. 22 is a table 240 showing, by way of example, test data. The sub columns listed under “Data” present measured hourly indoor and outdoor temperatures, direct irradiance on a vertical south-facing surface (VDI), electricity consumption that resulted in indoor heat, and average occupancy. Electric space heaters were used to heat the house and the HVAC system was not operated. The first three short-duration tests, described supra, were applied to this data. The specific data used are highlighted in gray. FIG. 23 is a table 250 showing, by way of example, the statistics performed on the data in the table 240 of FIG. 22 required to calculate the three test parameters. UA^(Total) was calculated using the data in the table of FIG. 10 and Equation (52). Thermal Mass (M) was calculated using UA^(Total), the data in the table of FIG. 10, and Equation (53). Effective Window Area (W) was calculated using UA^(Total), M, the data in the table of FIG. 10, and Equation (54).

These test parameters, plus a furnace rating of 100,000 Btu/hour and assumed efficiency of 56%, can be used to generate the end-of-period indoor temperature by substituting them into Equation (56) to yield:

$\begin{matrix} {T_{t + {\Delta \; t}}^{Indoor} = {T_{t}^{Indoor} + {{\left\lbrack \frac{1}{18,084} \right\rbrack \left\lbrack {{429\left( {T_{t}^{Outdoor} - T_{t}^{Indoor}} \right)} + {(250)P_{t}} + {3412\mspace{14mu} {Electric}_{t}} + {11,600\; {Solar}_{t}} + {(1)\left( {100,000} \right)(0.56){Status}_{t}}} \right\rbrack}\Delta \; t}}} & (74) \end{matrix}$

Indoor temperatures were simulated using Equation (74) and the required measured time series input datasets. Indoor temperature was measured from Dec. 15, 2014 to Jan. 31, 2015 for the test location in Napa, Calif. The temperatures were measured every minute on the first and second floors of the middle of the house and averaged. FIG. 24 is a graph 260 showing, by way of example, hourly indoor (measured and simulated) and outdoor (measured) temperatures. FIG. 25 is a graph 270 showing, by way of example, simulated versus measured hourly temperature delta (indoor minus outdoor). FIG. 24 and FIG. 25 suggest that the calibrated model is a good representation of actual temperatures.

Energy Consumption Modeling System

Modeling energy consumption for heating (or cooling) on an annual (or periodic) basis, as described supra with reference FIG. 3, and on an hourly (or interval) basis, as described supra beginning with reference to FIG. 12, and also shifting HVAC load by adjusting HVAC consumption that, in turn, affects indoor temperatures, as described supra beginning with reference to FIG. 15, can be performed with the assistance of a computer, or through the use of hardware tailored to the purpose. FIG. 26 is a block diagram showing a computer-implemented system 300 for modeling building heating energy consumption in accordance with one embodiment. A computer system 301, such as a personal, notebook, or tablet computer, as well as a smartphone or programmable mobile device, can be programmed to execute software programs 302 that operate autonomously or under user control, as provided through user interfacing means, such as a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. The computer system 301 includes hardware components conventionally found in a general purpose programmable computing device, such as a central processing unit, memory, input/output ports, network interface, and non-volatile storage, and execute the software programs 302, as structured into routines, functions, and modules. In addition, other configurations of computational resources, whether provided as a dedicated system or arranged in client-server or peer-to-peer topologies, and including unitary or distributed processing, communications, storage, and user interfacing, are possible.

In one embodiment, to perform the first approach, the computer system 301 needs data on heating losses and heating gains, with the latter separated into internal heating gains (occupant, electric, and solar) and auxiliary heating gains. The computer system 301 may be remotely interfaced with a server 310 operated by a power utility or other utility service provider 311 over a wide area network 309, such as the Internet, from which fuel purchase data 312 can be retrieved. Optionally, the computer system 301 may also monitor electricity 304 and other metered fuel consumption, where the meter is able to externally interface to a remote machine, as well as monitor on-site power generation, such as generated by a PV system 305. The monitored fuel consumption and power generation data can be used to create the electricity and heating fuel consumption data and historical solar resource and weather data. The computer system 301 then executes a software program 302 to determine annual (or periodic) heating fuel consumption 313 based on the empirical approach described supra with reference to FIG. 3.

In a further embodiment, to assist with the empirical tests performed in the second approach, the computer system 301 can be remotely interfaced to a heating source 306 and a thermometer 307 inside a building 303 that is being analytically evaluated for thermal performance, thermal mass, effective window area, and HVAC system efficiency. In a further embodiment, the computer system 301 also remotely interfaces to a thermometer 308 outside the building f163, or to a remote data source that can provide the outdoor temperature. The computer system 301 can control the heating source 306 and read temperature measurements from the thermometer 307 throughout the short-duration empirical tests. In a further embodiment, a cooling source (not shown) can be used in place of or in addition to the heating source 306. The computer system 301 then executes a software program 302 to determine hourly (or interval) heating fuel consumption 313 based on the empirical approach described supra with reference to FIG. 12.

In a still further embodiment, to shift HVAC load to change indoor temperature, the computer system 301 executes a software program 302 to calculate time series change in indoor temperature data 314, which provides an output temperature profile 314, based on the approach described supra with reference to FIG. 15. A time series change in HVAC load data 315 is used as input modified scenario values that represent an HVAC load shape. The HVAC load shape is selected to meet desired energy savings goals, such as reducing or flattening peak energy consumption load to reduce demand charges, moving HVAC consumption to take advantage of lower utility rates, or moving HVAC consumption to match PV production. Still other energy savings goals are possible.

The software program 302 uses only inputs of the time series change in HVAC load data 315 combined with thermal mass 316, HVAC efficiency 317, and thermal conductivity 318. The approach is applicable whenever there is consumption of electrical HVAC 313 and includes the summer when cooling is provided using electrical A/C and in the winter when heating is proved using electric resistance or heat pump technologies for controlling heating. The approach can be efficaciously applied when the building 303 has an on-site PV system 305.

Applications

The two approaches to estimating energy consumption for heating (or cooling), hourly and annual, provide a powerful set of tools that can be used in various applications. A non-exhaustive list of potential applications will now be discussed. Still other potential applications are possible.

Application to Homeowners

Both of the approaches, annual (or periodic) and hourly (or interval), reformulate fundamental building heating (and cooling) analysis in a manner that can divide a building's thermal conductivity into two parts, one part associated with the balance point resulting from internal gains and one part associated with auxiliary heating requirements. These two parts provide that:

-   -   Consumers can compare their house to their neighbors' houses on         both a total thermal conductivity UA^(Total) basis and on a         balance point per square foot basis. These two numbers, total         thermal conductivity UA^(Total) and balance point per square         foot, can characterize how well their house is doing compared to         their neighbors' houses. The comparison could also be performed         on a neighborhood- or city-wide basis, or between comparably         built houses in a subdivision. Other types of comparisons are         possible.     -   As strongly implied by the empirical analyses discussed supra,         heater size can be significantly reduced as the interior         temperature of a house approaches its balance point temperature.         While useful from a capital cost perspective, a heater that was         sized based on this implication may be slow to heat up the house         and could require long lead times to anticipate heating needs.         Temperature and solar forecasts can be used to operate the         heater by application of the two approaches described supra, so         as to optimize operation and minimize consumption. For example,         if the building owner or occupant knew that the sun was going to         start adding a lot of heat to the building in a few hours, he         may choose to not have the heater turn on. Alternatively, if the         consumer was using a heater with a low power rating, he would         know when to turn the heater off to achieve desired preferences.

Application to Building Shell Investment Valuation

The economic value of heating (and cooling) energy savings associated with any building shell improvement in any building has been shown to be independent of building type, age, occupancy, efficiency level, usage type, amount of internal electric gains, or amount solar gains, provided that fuel has been consumed at some point for auxiliary heating. As indicated by Equation (46), the only information required to calculate savings includes the number of hours that define the winter season; average indoor temperature; average outdoor temperature; the building's HVAC system efficiency (or coefficient of performance for heat pump systems); the area of the existing portion of the building to be upgraded; the R-value of the new and existing materials; and the average price of energy, that is, heating fuel. This finding means, for example, that a high efficiency window replacing similar low efficiency windows in two different buildings in the same geographical location for two different customer types, for instance, a residential customer versus an industrial customer, has the same economic value, as long as the HVAC system efficiencies and fuel prices are the same for these two different customers.

This finding vastly simplifies the process of analyzing the value of building shell investments by fundamentally altering how the analysis needs to be performed. Rather than requiring a full energy audit-style analysis of the building to assess any the costs and benefits of a particular energy efficiency investment, only the investment of interest, the building's HVAC system efficiency, and the price and type of fuel being saved are required.

As a result, the analysis of a building shell investment becomes much more like that of an appliance purchase, where the energy savings, for example, equals the consumption of the old refrigerator minus the cost of the new refrigerator, thereby avoiding the costs of a whole house building analysis. Thus, a consumer can readily determine whether an acceptable return on investment will be realized in terms of costs versus likely energy savings. This result could be used in a variety of places:

-   -   Direct display of economic impact in ecommerce sites. A Web         service that estimates economic value can be made available to         Web sites where consumers purchase building shell replacements.         The consumer would select the product they are purchasing, for         instance, a specific window, and would either specify the         product that they are replacing or a typical value can be         provided. This information would be submitted to the Web         service, which would then return an estimate of savings using         the input parameters described supra.     -   Tools for salespeople at retail and online establishments.     -   Tools for mobile or door-to-door sales people.     -   Tools to support energy auditors for immediate economic         assessment of audit findings. For example, a picture of a         specific portion of a house can be taken and the dollar value of         addressing problems can be attached.     -   Have a document with virtual sticky tabs that show economics of         exact value for each portion of the house. The document could be         used by energy auditors and other interested parties.     -   Available to companies interacting with new building purchasers         to interactively allow them to understand the effects of         different building choices from an economic (and environmental)         perspective using a computer program or Internet-based tool.     -   Enable real estate agents working with customers at the time of         a new home purchase to quantify the value of upgrades to the         building at the time of purchase.     -   Tools to simplify the optimization problem because most parts of         the problem are separable and simply require a rank ordering of         cost-benefit analysis of the various measures and do not require         detailed computer models that applied to specific houses.     -   The time to fix the insulation and ventilation in a homeowner's         attic is when during reroofing. This result could be integrated         into the roofing quoting tools.     -   Incorporated into a holistic zero net energy analysis computer         program or Web site to take an existing building to zero net         consumption.     -   Integration into tools for architects, builders, designers for         new construction or retrofit. Size building features or HVAC         system. More windows or less windows will affect HVAC system         size.

Application to Thermal Conductivity Analysis

A building's thermal conductivity can be characterized using only measured utility billing data (natural gas and electricity consumption) and assumptions about effective window area, HVAC system efficiency and average indoor building temperature. This test could be used as follows:

-   -   Utilities lack direct methods to measure the energy savings         associated with building shell improvements. Use this test to         provide a method for electric utilities to validate energy         efficiency investments for their energy efficiency programs         without requiring an on-site visit or the typical detailed         energy audit. This method would help to address the measurement         and evaluation (M&E) issues currently associated with energy         efficiency programs.     -   HVAC companies could efficiently size HVAC systems based on         empirical results, rather than performing Manual J calculations         or using rules of thumb. This test could save customers money         because Manual J calculations require a detailed energy audit.         This test could also save customers capital costs since rules of         thumb typically oversize HVAC systems, particularly for         residential customers, by a significant margin.     -   A company could work with utilities (who have energy efficiency         goals) and real estate agents (who interact with customers when         the home is purchased) to identify and target inefficient homes         that could be upgraded at the time between sale and occupancy.         This approach greatly reduces the cost of the analysis, and the         unoccupied home offers an ideal time to perform upgrades without         any inconvenience to the homeowners.     -   Goals could be set for consumers to reduce a building's heating         needs to the point where a new HVAC system is avoided         altogether, thus saving the consumer a significant capital cost.

Application to Building Performance Studies

A building's performance can be fully characterized in terms of four parameters using a suite of short-duration (several day) tests. The four parameters include thermal conductivity, that is, heat losses, thermal mass, effective window area, and HVAC system efficiency. An assumption is made about average indoor building temperature. These (or the previous) characterizations could be used as follows:

-   -   Utilities could identify potential targets for building shell         investments using only utility billing data. Buildings could be         identified in a two-step process. First, thermal conductivity         can be calculated using only electric and natural gas billing         data, making the required assumptions presented supra. Buildings         that pass this screen could be the focus of a follow-up,         on-site, short-duration test.     -   The results from this test suite can be used to generate         detailed time series fuel consumption data (either natural gas         or electricity). This data can be combined with an economic         analysis tool, such as the PowerBill service         (http://www.cleanpower.com/products/powerbill/), a software         service offered by Clean Power Research, L.L.C., Napa, Calif.,         to calculate the economic impacts of the changes using detailed,         time-of-use rate structures.

Application to “Smart” Thermostat Users

The results from the short-duration tests, as described supra with reference to FIG. 4, could be combined with measured indoor building temperature data collected using an Internet-accessible thermostat 321, such as a Nest thermostat device or a Lyric thermostat device, cited supra, or other so-called “smart” thermostat devices, thereby avoiding having to make assumptions about indoor building temperature. The building characterization parameters could then be combined with energy investment alternatives to educate consumers about the energy, economic, and environmental benefits associated with proposed purchases.

In addition, the HVAC load shifting methodology provides the basis for a real-time software service, such as a Web service 320 operating on a server 319 over the network 309, that optimizes HVAC system operation in conjunction with “smart” thermostats 321. The service would be applicable whenever there is electrical HVAC consumption, which includes during the summer when cooling is provided using electrical A/C and during the winter when heating is provided using electric resistance or heat pump technologies. The service is particularly applicable when the building has an on-site PV system. Moreover, the results of the HVAC load shifting strategy could be combined with forecasted PV output to provide daily guidance on how to optimize HVAC system operation, using, for instance, a smart thermostat 321 combined with a demand controller (not shown). The approach could minimize costs even when the consumer is on a complicated rate structure that has basic demand charges, and time-of-use demand charges or energy charges, such as the Salt River Project's E-27 rate structure.

While the invention has been particularly shown and described as referenced to the embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will understand that the foregoing and other changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for aligning HVAC consumption with photovoltaic production with the aid of a digital computer, comprising the steps of: obtaining time series net load for a time period during which HVAC load for a building will be shifted, an on-site PV system connected to the building, the time period comprising regular intervals; setting time series total load to equal the time series net load plus time series PV production data; estimating time series non-HVAC load during the time period; finding existing time series HVAC load by subtracting the time series non-HVAC load from the time series total load; selecting an HVAC load shifting strategy comprising moving HVAC consumption to match the PV production, the HVAC shifting strategy subject to one or more conditions associated with an indoor temperature of the building; constructing modified time series net load to match the selected HVAC load shifting strategy subject to operational constraints on the HVAC load remaining a positive value and exceeding the HVAC equipment rating; finding modified time series HVAC load by subtracting the time series non-HVAC load from the modified time series net load and adding to a result of the subtraction the time series PV production data; finding time series change in HVAC load by subtracting the modified time series HVAC load from the existing time series HVAC load; iteratively constructing time series change in indoor temperature for the time period as a function of the time series change in HVAC load and the thermal mass, thermal conductivity, and HVAC efficiency for the building; evaluating whether the modified time series HVAC load meets the operational constraints and that the conditions associated with the indoor temperature are satisfied, wherein the steps are performed by a suitably programmed computer and an HVAC system of the building is operated based on the HVAC load shifting strategy upon the evaluation the operational constraints and the conditions being met.
 2. A method according to claim 11, further comprising one of: constraining the changes in indoor temperature to equal zero at the beginning and ending of the time period; and constraining the changes in indoor temperature to not change beyond a specified range at the beginning and ending of the time period.
 3. A method according to claim 11, wherein the time series PV production data is one of measured, forecasted, or simulated.
 4. A method according to claim 11, wherein the time series PV production data is one of measured, forecasted, or simulated. 